The jet age ?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Running that through your engine is a recipe for turbine blade build-up. The lead levels in 100/130 avgas were bad enough for build-up in the spark plugs.

Glad I didn't waste half an hour of my life on this.
 
Typical flim-flam, lots of partial charts from unknown sources.
Lot's of statements we're supposed to automatically believe just because he says it's so.
Like climate scientist don't travel by air. Oh, really ?
Certain rare metals present in atmospheric samples . Oh, really ?

Like listening to a rabid Star Trek fan try to describe a plasma drive.
 

Hey now, I resemble that remark...
 

I have seen it suggested that jet engines don't run on fossil fuels, but compressed air instead.

One of the reasons is that they can't figure out how so much fuel can be stored in the wings.
 
Recently had an interesting discussion with a person who was trying to tell me the oceans have risen "over three feet in the past fifty years!!"...and I told them to compare the sea level in a 1942 photo of the USS Arizona's #2 casemate against a present day photo...the water lever is the same (right at the turret's quide) and that's a span of 75+ years.

Their reply was rather typical: "oh, those photos have been doctored by deniers!!"

*palmface*
 
 
NO,no,no. That's because the great turtle that carries us all on his back just started to spin a little faster over the past century and has thus created a venturi effect on the oceans and thus canceled out the rising levels because of the alien/atlantis/nazi underwater world cities industrial displacement upon the world's water bodies...
Or it could have just been the dolphins doing.
 
Yep, Dave nailed it. Another thing that most people are not aware about with regards to jet engines is that the fuel/air burn at its hottest is hotter than the actual melting point of the metal alloys the engine is made of. The reason why the engine doesn't burn itself is because of labrynthine cooling of components using either air or oil. Boreoscope inspections are carried out to look for the result of hot spots, and stators and rotors often melt because of the heat. This means that any metal in the fuel is gonna burn, baby, burn.

I've worked in the airline industry long enough to know that it's all BS. You can't keep something like that secret from 1,000s of airline employees who build, maintain and operate these aircraft round the world on a daily basis. We joke about it frequently at work, because there are clueless poeple who fall for it round the planet.
 
Many eons ago, when as a young man in High School we were taught that occasionally, depending on the cut of the fuel in the early days of jet engines that a copper inhibitor was sometimes added to jet fuel. But, we were also told it was being phased out. I doubt it has been used in the last 40 years.
 
This chemtrail nonsense started in the 90's with Art Bell's Coast-to-Coast AM radio program. It was all connected to the snake oil he was selling and since then, has become one of several popular conspiracies. The "chemtrails" allegedly stared in the early 60's.
Also, depending on the "official" website you go to, it's blamed on (pick one) the Trilateral Commission, Zionists, Globalists, Masons, Illuminatti, Rothschilds, World Bank or whatever.
There is always some anonymous government official who's turned over secret documents, but remains nameless for the safety of his family - this also appears to be the same nameless person who's turned over secret documents on geo-engineering, HAARP, the Moon landing hoax and several other ey conspiracies, too. The guy really gets around.

However, contrails were first encountered in WWII over Europe as high-altitude bombers encountered the cold, dry air that the 1,200 degree exhaust reacted with. Chemtrail experts seem to miss that key factor.

And the "heavy metals" raining down from the atmosphere were a little different...






Photo Source: ST1000DM003-1ER162
 
Last edited:
Just to throw this in to bolster the point. I've been fishing on and off in Newport back bay since I was about 13 that would be 40 years ago. At high tide the water still comes up to the same places on the same rocks that were there 40 years ago.
 
Apparently the average sea level rise over the 20th century is in the 0.2mm - 0.4mm per year range. Over 100 odd years that equates to around 40mm. Somewhat shy of 3ft.

In nearly 77 years since the USS Arizona was sunk the sea would have risen between 15.4mm and 30.8mm.
 
Never mind that, how do these metallic compounds being emitted by planes flying at 10km affect the atmosphere at 50-100km altitude?

There is some evidence that contrails do effect local weather, and there is some evidence that combustion products have detectable, likely insignificant, effects on the ozone layer. The thing is that these effects are from normal combustion byproducts, not additives. We know that human-produced chemicals can cause environmental damage -- witness the ozone hole that caused the banning of most CFCs -- but the evidence for weather changes and atmospheric damage from jet engines is fairly weak.

As I said earlier, chemicals with neurological effects were emitted by piston engines for decades; the main offender in this regard was lead.
 
Just to throw this in to bolster the point. I've been fishing on and off in Newport back bay since I was about 13 that would be 40 years ago. At high tide the water still comes up to the same places on the same rocks that were there 40 years ago.
You say "Newport Back Bay"...is that in Orange County (SoCal)?
Yes Dave it is. Caught a few pretty nice fish out of there over the years.
 
Several years back I was looking for info on runway layout and found some nut's website that said that the buildings hit on 9/11/01 could not have been struck by airplanes because they did not have IFR Aiming Marks painted on the side, like runways do.

Then there's the people who say the Apollo Moon missions were a hoax because you can't hear the engines running when the astronauts talked on the radio.

P.T. Barnum said there's a sucker born every minute. I think the production rate has gone up considerably since then.
 

Users who are viewing this thread