The Lancaster as a potential nuclear bomber in 1945

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Status
Not open for further replies.
From Wiki:

Silverplate operational units[edit]
Including the Pullman B-29, a total of 46 Silverplate B-29s were produced during World War II. Of these, 29 were assigned to the 509th Composite Group during World War II, with 15 used to carry out the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. An additional 19 Silverplate B-29s were ordered in July 1945, which were delivered between the end of the war, and the end of 1947. By this time only 13 of the original 46 were still operational. Thus, a total of 65 Silverplate B-29s were made, of which 32 were operational at the start of 1948.[27] Martin-Omaha produced 57 Silverplate B-29s. The other 8 were built by Boeing-Wichita. Of these 65 bombers, 31 were eventually converted to other configurations, 16 were placed in storage and later scrapped, and 12 were lost in accidents (including four of the Tinian bombers). The pair of historic weapons delivery aircraft, named Enola Gay and Bockscar, are today displayed in museums.[28][29][30]

The only other United States Air Force combat unit to use the Silverplate B-29 was the 97th Bombardment Wing at Biggs Air Force Base in El Paso, Texas. In mid-1949 it received 27 of the aircraft from the 509th Bombardment Wing when the latter transitioned to B-50D bombers.[31] The re-equipment of the 97th Bombardment Wing was part of an expansion of the atomic strike force to ten wings during 1949.[32] Within a year all were converted to TB-29 trainers. One other Silverplate B-29, on temporary assignment in the United Kingdom, was converted into a weather reconnaissance aircraft (WB-29) and transferred to the 9th Bombardment Wing at Travis Air Force Base in California.[31] The last Silverplate B-29 in service as a nuclear weapons carrier was reassigned to another role in November 1951, ending Silverplate after nearly eight years.[33]
 

Little Boy was smaller, in both diameter and length, than Thin Man.

Little Boy: 28" diameter 10ft long
Thin Man: 38" diameter 17ft long

Little Boy would fit in a Mosquito's bulged bomb bay, if a British style round tail unit had been used instead of the US style box tail.
 
Silverplate - Wikipedia



Silverplate - Wikipedia

Similar to what has been posted by others.

So, to summarise, the Lancaster was initially considered to carry the A-bomb because of the size and shape of Thin Man.
Thin Man failed and led to the development of Little Boy.
Only one Silverplate B-29 was configured to carry Thin Man, because it was cancelled in early 1944.
 
So, to summarise, the Lancaster was initially considered to carry the A-bomb because of the size and shape of Thin Man.

Primarily because it could be carried internally, by the looks of things from Ramsay's report. The B-29 was always going to be the nuclear bomber though, Gen Groves and Hap Arnold wanted an American aircraft, so it was always a long shot that it be actually converted (I'm curious to find out what the text Joe linked to that states that the Lanc was 'seriously considered' refers to and to what extent).
 
Last edited:
Thanks Dave, that's what Joe posted back a bit. I'm keen to find out what 'seriously considered' actually means. From the passages in the book that I posted it looks like the Lancaster was only listed by Ramsay because other than the B-29, it was the only bomber that might be able to carry a Thin Man internally, with less modification than the B-29.
 
On the B-29 the bomb bay was accessible in flight. The Hiroshima Little Boy was in fact armed, that is the detonation charges installed, while in flight. Would this have been possible to do in a Lancaster?
 
It's possible that had the B-29 program suffered some calamity, the the US would have turned to it's slightly less advanced stablemate the B-32
 
It's possible that had the B-29 program suffered some calamity, the the US would have turned to it's slightly less advanced stablemate the B-32
Lets be frank here. To drop an atomic bomb on Tokyo, Japan, you only need a limited production run of a pressurised bomber that has to fly outward from Tinian 1500 miles and back to Iwo Jima another 750 miles to refuel, take off again and return to Tinian. That's 2250 miles on the first leg, 3000 overall but not the 3000 there and back that the Superforts did. The only other pressurised high altitude bomber is the Vickers Windsor which had a range of 2890 miles carrying 8000 lbs of bombs when powered by Merlin 65's. As I see it, the Windsor is the only viable alternative. You only need a limited production run, so no problem.
 
Last edited:
The B-32 most likely would not have been structurally able to make the demanding turn and dive to get away from the shock wave. Another commander came to Tinian to try to take over the 509th and fly the mission. Tibbets, who had been practicing since Wendover invited him on one of the dummy missions over Japan to show him what he would need to do with the B-29 after bomb drop. The book said the wanna be turned white at the wing over and once back at base disappeared.
 
In addition, the man who armed the bomb had to get into very close proximity to the front of the weapon. He was incidentally a Naval Lt. Commander who came over with the device on the Indianapolis, if my memory serves.
 
Just a thought, but the USAAF did have a prospective alternate if the B-29 wasn't available.

The Douglas B-19A had the ability to lift a max. load over 37,000 pounds with a max. ceiling of 39,000 feet. It's top speed was 265mph and had a range of 4,200 miles (with a load of 18,000 pounds).

In 1944/45, it was literally sitting out the war on a ramp.
 
The B-32 most likely would not have been structurally able to make the demanding turn and dive

The Lancaster could make the turn and dive, as bomber crews practised such a manoeuvre as defence against night fighters. That's no suggestion it was anyway more suited for this than what we already know, though.


The Douglas B-19A had the ability to lift a max. load over 37,000 pounds with a max. ceiling of 39,000 feet. It's top speed was 265mph and had a range of 4,200 miles (with a load of 18,000 pounds).

Gee, that's some performance. How big was the bomb bay?
 
Gee, that's some performance. How big was the bomb bay?
Not sure of the actual dimensions of the bomb bay, but the B-19 was huge.
Wingspan was 212 feet (64.6m), length was over 132 feet (40.0m) and height was almost 43 feet (13m) and the tires on it's main gear were 8 feet tall.

Here's a shot of the command deck (looking back from the co-pilot's seat. Center is the engineer's station.


Here's a shot of it at Douglas, note the man standing in front of the starboard main gear...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread