The Zero's Maneuverability

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

So, if we flip the script on the A6M, what was WW2's most sluggish, least maneuverable single-engine, prop-powered, single-seat monoplane fighter with retractable gear? For starters, we're looking for fighters with the combination of low power-to-weight ratio (weight / horsepower) and high wing loading (weight / wing area).

For example, let's consider the Wikpedia stats for the Morane-Saulnier M.S.406.
Power-to-weight: 5,600 lb (gross) / 860 hp = 6.51
Wing loading: 5,600 lb (gross) / 170 sq ft = 32.94

And here's the A6M Zero.
Power-to-weight: 6,164 lb (gross) / 950 hp = 6.48
Wing loading: 6,164 lb (gross) / 242 sq ft = 25.47

So, while the MS.406 has essentially the same power-to-weight ratio as the A6M, the former has significantly higher wing loading. This would make the MS.406 a much less agile aircraft.
 
SaparotRob said:
F2A-3? Its even got squinky landing gear.
Click to expand...
The F2A's handling and basic maneuverability were actually quite good. The controls were pushrod operated, and not affected by cable stretch, and didn't heavy up quite so much at speed. What it didn't have was the size to take on all the stuff that combat experience was showing to be important - More guns, Armor Plate, high capacity self-sealing tanks, that sort of thing. If they'd put effort into reducing drag, it would have helped.
The biggest problem with the Buffalo vs the Zero was the same one that plagued everyone in the early part of the War - detecting an incoming raid early enough that you could scramble the fighters, get them formed up, and get them up to Altitude, Speed, and Position to engage, before the Zeros or Oscars fell on them like a box of rocks. Under those conditions, nobody comes out well - the initiative is all on the raider's side.
 
Wouldn't that be the lighter F2A-1?
 
The above figures for the A6M2-21 are incorrect because they include a 72IG DT!

The F4F-4:

7975lb:
Power-to-weight: 7975lb (full load, no external loads) 1200hp = 6.65/TO or 7.3 at Vmax (~19k ft) at Military Power.
Wing loading: 7975 lb / 260 sq ft = 30.7

A6M2-21
Power-to-weight: 5313 lb (full load, no external loads) / 940 hp (TO) = 5.5
Wing loading: 5313 lb / 242 sq ft = 22
 
The P-35s still in service in the Phillipines.

Seversky P-35 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org
 
I had been responding to The Admiral's comment regarding underpowered, sluggish, least maneuverable airplanes. I think it was "Pappy" Boyington who said of the early Buffalo that it could turn inside a phone booth. Of the F2A-3, after the Battle of Midway, there was the anecdote of just shooting the pilots on the ground and saving gas. That's why I brought up the -3.
I'm sure buffnut453 would have better info.
 
If you look at the actions of the Marine Wildcats at Midway, they didn't do any better - Getting hit on, or just after the initial climbout means that you're low energy, and therefore low options. Target selection - concentrating on the bombers, was also a factor, so was inexperience - Most of the fighter pilots were brand new, and get in very little training after being deployed to Midway.
 
Dimlee said:
Sorry, but the question was about "Japanese air strikes on Siberian airfields". Were there any?

(I read my first book about Khalkin-Gol/Nomohnah over 50 years ago. But thank you for your recommendations.)
Click to expand...
Been looking though the older books trying to find where Siberia came from, there were definitely airstrikes on a number of Red Air Force bases. Japan's War by Edwin P Hoyt has on 22 June 1939 the Red Air force counter attacked inflicting significant losses despite losing around a third of its aircraft. On 27 June a reinforced IJAAF struck Red Air Force airbases, "real escalation of the war, into Siberia", Tokyo found out about it afterwards. At least some of the Japanese commanders had ideas of cutting the trans Siberia rail line.
 
The Brewster Buffalo was several different planes.
It went from 3720-3750lbs empty on the early ones to 4760lbs on the F2A-3.
Normal gross with 110gal of fuel went from 5050lbs to just over 6500lbs.
British planes in Malaya were about 6100lbs.
All weights are for 110 US gallons of fuel. Going into combat with more fuel just makes things worse.
US fighters often did not carry full ammo on training flights.

Then you have the 3 engines. Forget the take-off power, it is somewhat deceptive.
The early engines gave 750-800hp at 15-16,000ft, depends on what rpm limit the pilots used on the engine, 2100rpm or 2200rpm. Military power was not a term used uses in 1939 or much of 1940.
The middle engine (many export fighters) was rated at 800hp at 17,100ft in high gear military power, if it was running correctly. The 1100hp for take-off didn't matter unless the Buffaloes were trimming the rubber tree tops.
The last engines used in the F2A-2 & -3 gave 1000hp at 14200ft if the pilot used the take-off rpm. If not the pilot got 900hp at 14-15,000ft. At 17,000ft the engine was good for 30-40hp less. The Power gain at altitude never matched the weight gain.
 
Thank you. The 27th June attack was against the VVS bases inside Mongolia, as I remember. Probably, the authors used "Siberia" as a general term for anything north of China.
 
Geoff - that puts it right in the middle of the Kahklkin Gol / Nomonhan Mini-War that the Soviets, Japanese, and their various Mongolian Associates.
I don't know off the top of my head if there were air raids into Siberia, but this was a For Real Multi-Division Combined Arms fight with a lot of airpower taking part on both sides.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

Regarding the true combat performance of the P-38 (and other advanced US fighters) in the PTO from 1942-44
6 7 8
Replies
157
Views
12K
beers
Would a Spitfire with the same wing area as on the Bf 109 have been a good idea or not?
3 4 5
Replies
89
Views
3K
PAT303
P
A
Would any other designs like the Arado E.583, the Blohm & Voss P 215 or the Lippisch P.13a have been better than the Horten Ho 229?
Replies
1
Views
1K
bada
B
M
Alternate Approach to the P-38 Compressibility Problem
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
SaparotRob
A
How did the I-16 Really Perform in WWII?
3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
4K
Airborne2001
A
Menu
Log in
Register