Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I disagree...Two T-38s crash at Laughlin AFB, one dead.
Two USAF T-38C Talons Crash, One Pilot Killed at Laughlin AFB
Two badly damaged T-38Cs seen on runway in photos from Texas Training Facility. Fourth T-38 crash in 2021. One pilot is dead and two others are injuredtheaviationist.com
Another crash of a two ship formation in the T-38. Two ship landings are probably the most hazardous event in the training syllabus. Your flying fast, around 180 mph on final, only a few feet apart, and you are getting closer to the ground, and, you have to depend that the other aircraft operators knowing what they are doing. Upon flair, speed slows slightly but margin of error approaches zero, and instructor ability to recover from error also approaches zero. AF is pondering elimination this task from undergraduate pilot training (UPT). Today, T-38 training is done only for those who are going on to fighter/bomber operations and probably are the better performers of the class. In my day, all AF pilots trained in the T-38 so the performance of the students could be less than that of today, however, there were no two ship crashes while I was in training. Moving this training to the operational command, maybe safer, although more expensive. I do not know if this accident was on take off or landing. As just about in all aircrafts, take offs are easier, and less hazardous than landings.
Side note. The toughest task for me, and least looked forward to, in the T-38, was flying No. 4 in a four ship formation when No 2 was a student. Staying on the wing of a bobbing No. 2 could be hair raising. I tended to just back off a bit and try flying off lead with a buffer. IPs didn't like this, it spread out the formation, but I never got yelled at, or was I told to close up, they probably knew the problem.
I disagree... Flying formation IS inherently more dangerous than single ship..
ONE mishap does NOT mean changing the req's for fighter pilots should change.
Additionally, formation landings are NOT any more dangerous than standard formation flying.
Total BS..Two T-38s crash at Laughlin AFB, one dead.
Two USAF T-38C Talons Crash, One Pilot Killed at Laughlin AFB
Two badly damaged T-38Cs seen on runway in photos from Texas Training Facility. Fourth T-38 crash in 2021. One pilot is dead and two others are injuredtheaviationist.com
Another crash of a two ship formation in the T-38. Two ship landings are probably the most hazardous event in the training syllabus. Your flying fast, around 180 mph on final, only a few feet apart, and you are getting closer to the ground, and, you have to depend that the other aircraft operators knowing what they are doing. Upon flair, speed slows slightly but margin of error approaches zero, and instructor ability to recover from error also approaches zero. AF is pondering elimination this task from undergraduate pilot training (UPT). Today, T-38 training is done only for those who are going on to fighter/bomber operations and probably are the better performers of the class. In my day, all AF pilots trained in the T-38 so the performance of the students could be less than that of today, however, there were no two ship crashes while I was in training. Moving this training to the operational command, maybe safer, although more expensive. I do not know if this accident was on take off or landing. As just about in all aircrafts, take offs are easier, and less hazardous than landings.
Side note. The toughest task for me, and least looked forward to, in the T-38, was flying No. 4 in a four ship formation when No 2 was a student. Staying on the wing of a bobbing No. 2 could be hair raising. I tended to just back off a bit and try flying off lead with a buffer. IPs didn't like this, it spread out the formation, but I never got yelled at, or was I told to close up, they probably knew the problem.
Not other than aircraft limits.. no turbulence limits at all, crosswind limits, RCR limits, and weather limits.. . Turbulence made it more work..Did you have any limitations on formation landing in turbulent weather?
The USAF only qualified Fighter crews to CAT 1 mins.. 200 1/2.. and then only in mission necessary situations.. the NORMAL WX mins were 300/1.We were trained for CAT2 landings, 100' ceiling and ¼ mile visibility (not in formation). Never flew one though, only two runways in the world was CAT2 qualified.
I was in 83-05 at Vance.. 'The Moose Hunters' I don't remeber how may fighters came down but it was about 1/3 the class. I remember two F-15's, one F-16, two T-33's, three F-111's, one A-10 and a bunch of F-4's.. there were also a scary number of FAIP's assignedI was in class 71-03 at Vance, we had 5 fighter slots come down for a class of 52. Where did you go to UPT and what class were you in.
I am not sure of what tack you are sitting on. The subject was UPT not squadron operational training. My comment "probably the most hazardous event in the training syllabus" is probably correct for UPT. Obviously squadron level training and operations where the aircraft operational envelop is often pushed, aircraft on aircraft combat simulation forces close proximities, and air-to-ground, and low level penetration training requires close proximity to the ground and introduces such concerns as target fixation is extremely hazardous. No body said formation training should be eliminated. Nobody argued it was not important. Nobody even recommended changing it. However. four aircraft loses and three dead pilots (including students?) in two years in the Air Training Command, is a big deal and bad for AF publicity.Total BS..
Formation flying most dangerous! Ridiculous.. have you every been in an air to air fight? Even in training when you have more than a dozen aircraft. in a swirling high 'g', confused engagement.. that approaching dangerous.. but is necessary training.
What about formation flying at 100' agl at 500 to 600 knots?
Why are there more fatalities in the TAF (Tactical Air Forces) associated with low level ops than ANY OTHER mission?
TWO mishaps in TWO years LOL... LOL.... LOL.. thats hilarious!! in 2000.. the last years I was in the USAF reserves the TAF we lost between 40 and 55 Fighters a YEAR.. with about 30 fatalities A YEAR..
Your opinion of formation flying is NOT based in reality.. IF the USAF is re-evaluating form training .. its NOT to eliminate it.. but to IMPROVE it..
Yes, landing from the break is what I've done with the limited formation work. I've also done 1 formation landing, but, while we can do them, they're seen as an unnecessary risk in a tail-wheel aircraft.Actually, I'm not sure. There are a couple of guys here that could answer that, including beercamel2 and Biff15. It is totally cool to see and to perform, but I,m not sure of operational use other than maybe escorting damaged aircraft where damaged aircraft takes the lead but terminates at touchdown. We did practice echelon. eg. all aircraft are stacked on one side or the other, landings where lead breaks from initial, a few seconds later 2 breaks, a few seconds later 3, etc. I suspect this is more common. Again, I'm just guessing, there are others who are quite familiar with multi-aircraft operations.
As for escorting a damaged plane down, the escort always carries out a go-around. If the lead has a handling issue on the ground you've got a two-plane pile-up.
Agree!Yes, landing from the break is what I've done with the limited formation work. I've also done 1 formation landing, but, while we can do them, they're seen as an unnecessary risk in a tail-wheel aircraft.
As for escorting a damaged plane down, the escort always carries out a go-around. If the lead has a handling issue on the ground you've got a two-plane pile-up.