SaparotRob
Unter Gemeine Geschwader Murmeltier XIII
Now that things have changed a bit, it seems the F-35 is catching less flak. Pun intended.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Thanks for the correction!Over 770 now: Fast Facts
Not a problem. Some still seem to claim it is in a 'death spiral' and to be cancelled any day...Thanks for the correction!
Pretty good for an aircraft that was supposed to be an utter failure!
The talking heads were convinced that the F-16 was a waste of money, plagued by cost over-runs, too complicated to be of any use in combat situations, doomed to failure, no other nations would be interested in buying it, etc.Not a problem. Some still seem to claim it is in a 'death spiral' and to be cancelled any day...
I thought Diefenbacker torpedoed Canada's indigenous aircraft industry.As a Canadian, I agree. We have a government that is shy about military spending, which slows things quite a bit. Personally, I'd like to see us buy new F-15s, but there's a serious issue with that, as Boeing has damaged the Canadian indigenous aircraft industry, so buying from them is a REALLY tough call. That pretty much leaves the F-35 or some lesser European airplane. Tough decision for us up here. Honestly, I don't know what the best path is...
re Boeing recent damaging of Canada's indigenous aircraft industry.
Short story is Boeing (rightly or wrongly) used the mini-trade war during the Trump administration to screw up sales of Canadian built aircraft to the US market, by arguing for penalties against Bombadier, resulting in a 300% tariff. There is was a bit more involved, see:
"U.S. backs 300 percent in duties on Bombardier after Boeing complaint"
Just pointing out what (I think) KeithA0000 alluded to in his post#36 up-thread.
Also, he said ". . . Boeing has damaged . . .", not 'has destroyed'.
Also, I did say ". . . (rightly or wrongly) . . ." and "There is was a bit more involve . . ."
Damage - Destroy
Tomato - Tomatoe
Not a really good analogy because it's "Tomato - Tomato"....it's just that one country calls it a "tomayto" while another calls it a "tomahto".
Happy you ninny?
Yeah but the country that says it wrong also drives on the wrong side of the road.
Ecstatic, brother. Can't recall the last time anyone called me a ninny, though.
Yeah but the country that says it wrong also drives on the wrong side of the road.
I used my best English accent and stuck my pinky out while drinking my coffee while saying it too.
Glad I wasn't there to hear it. Most Americans attempting to do an English accent are the equivalent of nails on a chalkboard. Would like to see a pic of you drinking coffee with your pinky out, though...I need a laugh!
back in the days of yore, what?Which country is wrong? America copied the French in driving on the right, whereas the Brits drive on the left because, back in days of yore, driving on the left meant you could defend yourself with your sword hand.
So please tell me who's right?
(And the correct answer is the Brits are right, if for no other reason that ANYTHING French is INHERENTLY WRONG....except baguettes and brie)