Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
On earlier modelsOr neither, as no one engine was worse than the other! (semantics, I know, but you get what I mean)
I think that the left engine was considered 'critical' as there was only one generator?
"No wonder we lost so many"
number built Lockheed P-38 Lightning 10,037.
WWII flying safety took a back seat to combat. The AAF's worst accident rate was recorded by the A-36 Invader version of the P-51: a staggering 274 accidents per 100,000 flying hours. Next worst were the P-39 at 245, the P-40 at 188, and
the P-38 at 139. All were Allison powered.
Makes sense - as far as accidents go, you are most likely to have an accident during take-off or landing.Interesting about those WWII accident statistics; did you notice the higher accident numbers were racked up by the relatively shorter legged aircraft that mostly logged less time per flight? Maybe accident rate per 10,000 sorties would be more instructive. What do you think? Is that something that can be resurrected from existing records? A statistian I'm not.
Starting reading this wrong - very true, and engine out on take off killed a lot of butterbars.
Very true, the P-38 had TWO critical engines while the P-322 had just the one but the P-322 had less power as well.
As for the rotation direction (I read through the link) while inboard rotation provides the best single engine performance outboard rotation provides much better controllability at high power and high alpha as the propwash rotation gave the inboard wing the greatest angle of attack and the outboard wing the least. With inboard rotation, the throttles wide open and the wing at max alpha the wing section outboard of the nacelle is at first risk of stall, and it's very much more difficult to control an airplane with an outboard wing stall than inboard. In other words, they were going for best combat maneuverability not "oh-my-god-the-engine-might-quit" performance.
PS - As for the myth of the XP-82 not being able to fly with outboard rotation propellers due to the upward propwash being blanked by the wing on its way to the stab, the test pilot(s) simply tapped the brakes on takeoff roll to lift the tail. There are pictures of the XP-82 with outboard prop rotation in flight.
-->If Rambler still made cars I would own one, I suppose.<---
All well and good if you have speed and altitude. If you're ten feet in the air, heavy, gear still down, TO flaps set, past V1 and VMC, but not yet to VYSE, you need all the power you can get and you need to wrestle the aircraft into its SE minimum drag/maximum lift flight attitude and STAY IN GROUND EFFECT until you reach VYSE. Otherwise you'll probably never accelerate or climb. If you can't meet these conditions, close the throttles, pull the firewall shutoffs, and brace for impact. Better to hit rightside up and slowing than inverted and accelerating.a.) don't increase power immediately with good engine, and b.) don't feather (you may get the wrong engine - stabilize first and get a/c under control, then gradually apply power while getting clearance to go around and land.