When does 'art' become porn?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Maestro said:
Taking a shot of a nude minor is child porn and should be threated as such.


And if you want to know the difference between art and porn, it's rather easy... A nude girl is art. A nude girl with something in her ass or p*ssy is porn.
Click to expand...


Huh?
You are making two opposite arguments here!

Is it A.)

Maestro said:
Taking a shot of a nude minor is child porn
Click to expand...

Or B.)

Maestro said:
A nude girl is art.
Click to expand...

And what is your definition of "minor" or "child"? 16? 17? 18?

Is it the age of consent of the girl in her home country or state? The state where the picture was taken? The home state of the photographer?

If you took pictures of your 19 yr old wife nude in Tunisia should you be charged with child porn? {age of consent is 20 there}

Is it Ok to take "art pictures" of a nude 13 yr old girl in Mexico if she agrees? {age of consent is 12 in Mexico}

Should a 18 yr old be charged with child porn if he has nude pics of his 16 yr old girlfriend on vacation in California? {age of consent = 18}

What if they are both from South Carolina? {age of consent = 14}

Just playing devil's advocate here.

I'm asking where do you draw the line, I've met "mature" 16 yr old girls capable of making decisions about their own sexuality and 25 yr old mental "basket cases" who are not.
 
When does 'art' become porn?

I think every time I look at "art"

Regards
Kruska
 

Sorry, but trusting your child to a publicist?!? What a friggin' moron. He, of all people ought to know that the one who will know best is one the PARENTS. His quote says it all...
"So I was surprised when I saw it, you know, but ... stuff happens"

Stuff happens?!?! He should be furious.
 
Maestro said:
I think you only forgot to read a tiny word in my post...

Now, if your an adult (18 or over) the second sentence you quoted apply. You can pose nude or you can do porn.
Click to expand...

Ok. Sorry, I think perhaps in your post you should have put "woman" {ie over 18} as I understood "girl" to be under 18.

Maestro said:
A nude girl is art.
Click to expand...



Eric, from what I understand he was at the photo shoot and had no objections to it at the time, he even saw the proofs of that shot. The only one to blame for failing in his duty is him. When the photographer at the shoot says "Ok, now I need your 15 yr old daughter to take her clothes off" that would be the time for a responsible parent to step in, not crying about it later when the scandal breaks!
 
But getting back to the original post, I think there should be a distinction between the pervert that violates a small child to make porn, and the foolish 15-16 yr old girl who willingly sends nude pictures of herself to her boyfriend. I think she has to take some responsibility in this.

Of course the guy was a creep to post them on the internet, but in the bigger picture I think the message to other young girs shouldn't be "see the bad man is in jail now", but the message too young girls should be:

"if you send nude pics to anyone {even your loving boyfriend} they can end up on the net, with only yourself to blame"

Maybe they would think twice about sending them...
 
Maestro said:
Isn't it already the case ? I mean, what do you propose ? We can't send her to jail.
Click to expand...

I think what I am saying is that they are sending the wrong message to young girls by excessive prosecution {IMO} I don't think the guy deserves major jail time for child porn for pics that she sent him. He should get a misdemeanor something pay a fine. The "child porn" will get thrown out anyways, as nudity is legal {even for a 15 yr old} unless there is some sexual content

By blowing this up into a big deal, it tells girls that they are the "victim", when really the stupid t**ts are responsible for their own embarassment.
 
Sorry for bumping this old thread, but guess what showed up in my browser when I was loging-on to Hotmail...

Safe Sex with Hannah Montana? : Dramarama : CelebEdge : Sympatico / MSN

So now they want to make her sell condoms ? Don't get me wrong, I'm all for teaching the "mysteries of sexuality and safe sex" to teenagers, but I think the message just won't pass.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't she supposed to still be a virgin and "keeping it for marriage" ? I guess it's all the opposite of selling condoms ! I think they would have better luck with a well known slut like Jenna Jameson.
 
....or Britney Spears. Didn't I hear somewhere that her mom made the decision to "market" her daughter as a sex-icon, instead of a "dang, she's a good singer"? The second method works slower, yes, and runs the risk of failure if nobody likes the music. The first is faster, and only sacrifices your daughter's self-esteem and self-respect and sanity.
 
Maestro said:
Yep... But it's almost the same case that Cyrus... Spears was "claiming" to be keeping it for marriage... Even if we all suspect she sucked some dicks to get a record contract.

Did I just think that out loud ? Woohoops...
Click to expand...

Hey chill out! You do not have to be so graphic in your posting! Don't write something like that again! Do you understand??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

Hearts of Iron 4: When Italy isn't Sh*t
Replies
2
Views
532
Gnomey
When was the first attempt to fly the Atlantic?
Replies
4
Views
618
Lucky13
Aviation Art....
2
Replies
25
Views
2K
Gnomey
Become a Pilot
Replies
9
Views
961
bravenest0
Does sacking manager do anything?
Replies
7
Views
1K
WARSPITER
Menu
Log in
Register