Shortround6
Major General
From an official test report.
" I have seen it stated that celerity of loading and firing might be found objectionable, as the solider would too soon expend his ammunition........I am fully convinced that there is no force to such an objection. The soldier in battle, possessed of angun that can be instantly reloaded, keeping his eye on the foe, confident of his power and strength (that he is always ready), naturally is inspired with courage and self-possession which are valuable to a solider........I can see no reason to justify the idea that a soldier qualified with an arm possessing great celerity of fire is likely to waste his ammunition at the first sight of a distant enemy.............
I.......recommend that it's adoption to the Marine Corps, believing, as i do, that such an action on the part of the Government will increase the efficiency of that force more than double its present power."
From the report of J. Green, First Lieutenant, U.S. Marine Corps, to Colonel John Harris, Commandant, Marine Corps, 6 February 1860
Report was on the Sharps Breech-loading rifle (which at the time used a separate percussion cap from cartridge) compared to the currant muzzle loader.
The argument that soldiers would waste their ammo and quickly run out is an old one.
I am working my way through the first posted link/report and so far it seems to be a snipe hunt.
Posting a picture of the most complicated and expensive rear sight used on a general issue rifle in WW II seems at least as relevant
as 300 page treatise on artillery and airpower as used to hold down infantry casualties in insurgent warfare. I will keep reading and see if the author actually mentions small arms more than once every few dozen or few score pages
Passage from page 79
"Firepower too easily becomes an acceptable and quick solution for commanders who have neither the experience nor the time to come to grips with the militarily elusive and politically sophisticated challenges of counterinsurgency operations. It is through overemphasis and over-reliance on artillery and aerial bombardment that commanders change effective military tactics into counterproductive operations."
firepower seems to be synonymous with artillery and air strikes so far in this Treatise.
" I have seen it stated that celerity of loading and firing might be found objectionable, as the solider would too soon expend his ammunition........I am fully convinced that there is no force to such an objection. The soldier in battle, possessed of angun that can be instantly reloaded, keeping his eye on the foe, confident of his power and strength (that he is always ready), naturally is inspired with courage and self-possession which are valuable to a solider........I can see no reason to justify the idea that a soldier qualified with an arm possessing great celerity of fire is likely to waste his ammunition at the first sight of a distant enemy.............
I.......recommend that it's adoption to the Marine Corps, believing, as i do, that such an action on the part of the Government will increase the efficiency of that force more than double its present power."
From the report of J. Green, First Lieutenant, U.S. Marine Corps, to Colonel John Harris, Commandant, Marine Corps, 6 February 1860
Report was on the Sharps Breech-loading rifle (which at the time used a separate percussion cap from cartridge) compared to the currant muzzle loader.
The argument that soldiers would waste their ammo and quickly run out is an old one.
I am working my way through the first posted link/report and so far it seems to be a snipe hunt.
Posting a picture of the most complicated and expensive rear sight used on a general issue rifle in WW II seems at least as relevant
as 300 page treatise on artillery and airpower as used to hold down infantry casualties in insurgent warfare. I will keep reading and see if the author actually mentions small arms more than once every few dozen or few score pages
Passage from page 79
"Firepower too easily becomes an acceptable and quick solution for commanders who have neither the experience nor the time to come to grips with the militarily elusive and politically sophisticated challenges of counterinsurgency operations. It is through overemphasis and over-reliance on artillery and aerial bombardment that commanders change effective military tactics into counterproductive operations."
firepower seems to be synonymous with artillery and air strikes so far in this Treatise.
Last edited: