Which WWII aircraft would you choose?

Conslaw · Aug 27, 2020

Another option would be the B-17 equipped with the Fulton Surface to Air Rescue System or STARS, better known as SKYHOOK, as featured in the James Bond movie "Thunderball."

Reason: let's say you are at a party, and it is boring. you simply use your wrist radio to call your plane. You deploy the helium balloon with the snare from a secret compartment in your tux, which of course has a built-in harness, and next thing you know, you are sailing through the air on the way to a better party.
Thunderball Skyhook scene - low res

GrauGeist · Aug 27, 2020

That, good sir, earns bacon for the most excellent creativity!

jetcal1 · Aug 27, 2020

Shortround6 said:
Stick a fake turret on top and call it a war bird
View attachment 592790

Tried to get a buddy of mine to buy one of those "quite a few" years ago.

A company I worked for owned a tri-gear 250. Not this one! (Credit the Dee Howard Foundation)

herman1rg · Aug 28, 2020

That's beautfiul

contrails16 · Aug 28, 2020

GrauGeist said:
Ok, so you have the finances and technical connections to have any single aircraft of WWII that actually existed during the war, built from the ground up, regardless of type or nationality - what would it be and why.

For me, it would be the He280 because it has a destinct 1930's look to it's design, it was a nimble and responsive aircraft and it was the world's first combat jet and no examples exist, making it extremely rare.

That's a tough one! It comes down to either the FW-190 A5 or the A6M3 Zero for me
Both are timeless designs that have their flaws wn unique flight characteristics. If I had to go to war in it I would likely the choose the 190, if I just was going to fly it for fun it would be the A6M3. If it was to look at... both

Spitlead · Sep 11, 2020

Admiral Beez said:
Westland Whirlwind would be nice. seen here in unarmed spec...

View attachment 592382

View attachment 592383

I'd replace the four Hispano 20mm with a fuel tank in the nose. The extra fuel and lack of barrels should increase range to close to 2,000 kms (1,200 miles).

I have to say, the Whirlwind engine nacelles look like they came straight off of a Mosquito. The landing gear as well.

Capt. Vick · Sep 11, 2020

All of them?

aknome · Sep 20, 2020

Grumman F7F Tigercat.

soulezoo · Sep 22, 2020

How about a BV 141? Just to be different of course. Very different. Or a DO 335. I just like that aircraft.

windhund116 · Sep 23, 2020

Fw189 seems to have a good reputation, from its pilots, from what I've read. Handling, sturdiness, visibility, take-off and landing characteristics.

herman1rg · Sep 23, 2020

windhund116 said:
Fw189 seems to have a good reputation, from its pilots, from what I've read. Handling, sturdiness, visibility, take-off and landing characteristics.

Interesting choice, one of my first model kits was of that. I always thought the engines looked small.

However I've also found this LuftArchiv.de - Das Archiv der Deutschen Luftwaffe

GrauGeist · Sep 23, 2020

herman1rg said:
I always thought the engines looked small.

The Argus 411 wasn't a very large engine to start with.
I always wondered why Focke-Wulf didn't use an engine like the Gnome-Rhone for the 189.

davparlr · Sep 23, 2020

p-51H
P-80 with good fuel pumps

I would need to be trained to take off a high torque tail dragger but the P-80 should be a piece of cake.

Escuadrilla Azul · Sep 23, 2020

GrauGeist said:
The Argus 411 wasn't a very large engine to start with.
I always wondered why Focke-Wulf didn't use an engine like the Gnome-Rhone for the 189.

Perhaps couldn't got enough of them neither weren't reliable. Hs 129 had plenty of engine problems in Russia and North Africa

DerAdlerIstGelandet · Sep 23, 2020

GrauGeist said:
The Argus 411 wasn't a very large engine to start with.
I always wondered why Focke-Wulf didn't use an engine like the Gnome-Rhone for the 189.

Availability ...

NevadaK · Sep 23, 2020

I may have posted on this thread before, but thinking about it rationally. For M-F flying back and forth to the office, this:

For weekend camping, photo or fishing trips or runs to the hardware store, this:

and for keeping in the garage as a father son project and an occasional tear around the block, this:

I currently have three cars in my garage, why can't I have three planes in my hangar. And, yes I nominated the Heston as one of the worst planes, but it looks too cool not to admire. Besides, old Ferraris are troublesome and break down a lot too.

windhund116 · Sep 23, 2020

The Lockheed Constellation was a really good looking plane.

swampyankee · Sep 23, 2020

windhund116 said:
The Lockheed Constellation was a really good looking plane.

Agreed; easily the prettiest of the piston airliners. Arguably though, the DC-6/DC-7 were better at the job of being airliners.

----

There are probably hundreds of different WW2 aircraft I wish were in flying, or even museum, condition, from trainers, like the N3N to what may have been the apex of Republic's piston-engined aircraft, the Republic Rainbow. I'd like to see some of the aircraft from countries other the US, UK, and Germany.

Is there a flyable N3N? They weren't retired from service until 1961.

GrauGeist · Sep 23, 2020

swampyankee said:
Is there a flyable N3N? They weren't retired from service until 1961.

It doesn't seem that any of the surviving types are airworthy but the fact that over a dozen examples out of almost a thousand built is fairly impressive.

Milosh · Sep 24, 2020

Favorite planes are: F4U, Fw190D-9, Hawker Tempest V.

Which WWII aircraft would you choose?

Senior Airman

Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung

Staff Sergeant

Tech Sergeant

Airman

Airman 1st Class

Moderator

Recruit

Senior Airman

Senior Airman

Tech Sergeant

Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung

Senior Master Sergeant

Tech Sergeant

Private Chemtrail Disperser

Senior Airman

Senior Airman

Chief Master Sergeant

Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung

Senior Master Sergeant

Users who are viewing this thread

Similar threads