why didn't the Wright brothers think of ailerons? (1 Viewer)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

"They carried the machine up on the Hill", John T. Daniels, eye witness

The fact that Flyer I 1903 just glided, aided partly by the engine, was confirmed apparently unwillingly by John T. Daniels, an eye witness, in a letter addressed to a friend:

"Manteo NC, June 30 —- 1933,

Dear friend,

I Don't know very much to write about the flight. I was there, and it was on Dec the 17, — 1903 about 10 o'clock. They carried the machine up on the Hill and Put her on the track, and started the engine … and he went about 100 feet or more, and then Mr. Wilbur taken the machine up on the Hill and Put her on the track and he went off across the Beach about a half a mile …
Sincerely,
John T. Daniels, Manteo NC, Box 1W
"
Source: Eyewitness Account of First Flight by John Daniels

Let me put there what the website you quote says as a remark to this letter:
Here is his letter to a friend describing what he saw just as he wrote it. The letter was written 20 years after the famous event and Daniels confused some of the events that occurred on Dec. 17th with events that occurred on the 14th. The coin toss he describes occurred on the 14th.
Eyewitness Account of First Flight by John Daniels

With other words this account is not reliable. Yes, the Wrights flew from the Hill on 14th december as confirmed by the brothers themselves. You just easily ignored that didn't you? Would you please get the hell out of this thread?

Simplex is just full of it.


The link Gaeme provides tells all...
 
Last edited:
I'm going to mimic the moderator from the site posted by Gaeme.

Thanks for locking this Chris!

"I am seeing a case here of if it 'ain't want I (ME) believe' it cannot be right. That is clearly crass. Not even Mr Crouch who has been close enough to the facts, the site, and with the history in written terms before him and, who knows, other factors that the photographs prove to be inconclusive - though others don't


The one above shows that the horizon is not 'level' - it shows that the wings are not level. Both allow for deceptive matters to creep in. Little, but then photographs do lie!


Whatever. This subject is going round in circles with simplex1 almost insisting that his take is spot on. I don't agree and neither does Mr Crouch. It is, therefore, a matter of what the museum thinks of it and I know who my money is on.


It is a matter of corroborated record of what happened so who are we to try and change history.


The matter is over gentlemen. The end was in sight some days ago and that is where it stops. Thanks all the same."
 
All begins from Leonardo da Vinci's "Codice sul volo degli uccelli" "Book about how byrds fly"

1377173855159_leonardo-codice-volo-uccelli-particolare2.jpg




and subsequent drawings

leonardo5.jpg




Otto Lilienthal machines are clearly inspired from those of Leonardo and the Wright brothers clearly understood that the accident that cost Lilienthal's life was the lack of lateral control



7e16b3d73095a80aa88b570e925c7de1_lilienthal.jpg




and warping the wing tips for lateral control was then widespread

5988173529_c62306b2bc_b.jpg


until appeared some primitive ailerons with Santos Dumont

14-bis-ailerons.jpg




and Glen Curtiss



curtiss-bell-junebug.jpg




but was Henri Farman to "invent" the aileron as we know it today.

farman-farman3.jpg


As many inventions, it was made from step to step
 
Last edited:
Don't forget the Taube which carried the theory that a bird-shaped aircraft would be the most efficient and is perhaps the closest design to an actual bird that any successful aircraft design managed to get.

It also used wing-warping as a means of control instead of ailerons (the original Etrich and Rumpler version out of the many types produced by many manufacturers)

Even more impressive, is that it was actually put into military service for a time.
 
Tenente Giulio Gavotti

Giulio%20Gavotti%20001.jpg


(17 October 1882 – 6 October 1939), in a Taube, set two firsts in the history of aviation: he was the first man to make an aerial bombardment from an aeroplane and as well as the first to perform a night mission in the Italo-Turkish war, Lybia, 1911.

taube-e-gavotti.png
 
No, Gavotti dropped four "Granate Cippelli" on a Turkish troop camp. In a very dangerous ( for him, of course....) way.....
 
Last edited:
but was Henri Farman to "invent" the aileron as we know it today.

No, sorry Elmas, it was Robert Esault Pelterie, not 'On Ree Far Man.

Robert Esnault-Pelterie | French aviation pioneer

Also, the 14bis wasn't fitted with 'ailerons'; they were more like spoilers that disrupted the flow of air round the wing - in the event they had little effect on the aircraft's course. The 14bis was not controllable about three axes of movement, hence the claims of first flights perpetuated by Brazilians don't qualify for sustained controlled powered flight.
 
The fact that Flyer I 1903 just glided, aided partly by the engine, was confirmed apparently unwillingly by John T. Daniels, an eye witness, in a letter addressed to a friend:


I am not an expert but I have spent years watching aeroplanes fly, none of them move an inch down the runway without the engines running. The first Wright flyer performed as well as any bi plane with a 14BHP motor could be expected to.

Regarding wing warping wiki says this "
Along with five other European aircraft builders, from 1910, Blériot was involved in a five-year legal struggle with the Wright Brothers over the latter's wing warping patents. The Wrights' claim was dismissed in the French and the German courts.[31]"

Maybe this could have affected some designers choices?
 
Can't see that page unfortunately. What is the author's source? There is plenty of information about Robert Esnault Pelterie out there that contradicts that statement, for example:

"The pioneering U.S. aeronautical engineer Octave Chanute published descriptions and drawings of the Wright brothers' 1902 glider in the leading aviation periodical of the day, L'Aérophile, in 1903. This prompted Esnault-Pelterie, a French military engineer, to build a Wright-style glider in 1904 that used ailerons in lieu of wing warping.[4] The French journal L'Aérophile then published photos of the ailerons on Esnault-Pelterie's glider which were included in his June 1905 article, and its ailerons were widely copied afterward.[7][14][15]"

From here: Aileron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"After studying engineering at the Sorbonne in Paris, Esnault-Pelterie built his first glider, a very rough copy of the Wright glider of 1902 but constructed without an understanding of the Wright brothers' control system. As a result, he abandoned the attempt to fly the glider with a wing-warping system and became the first flying-machine pioneer to make use of ailerons, moveable surfaces on the trailing edge of the wing, to maintain lateral control."

From here:

Robert Esnault-Pelterie | French aviation pioneer

This page lists reference sources about REP, including several that state he 'invented' the aileron, which, of course he did not, (see here "The aileron was first patented by the British scientist and inventor Matthew Piers Watt Boulton in 1868, based on his 1864 paper On Aërial Locomotion." from Aileron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) although he was the first to fit it to a man-carrying aircraft.

The Pioneers : An Anthology : Robert Esnault-Pelterie (1881-1957)
 
So which came 1st, 3D active coordinated control surfaces on aeroplanes, airships, or torpedo/submarines?

The latter two work differently to ailerons, which deflect differentially; the left goes up while the right goes down and vice versa, whereas on airships and torpedoes, the horizontal surfaces worked as elevators, both in synch with each other. To turn, the vehicles used rudder.
 
No worries James, although I think the most modern subs with X configured fins might have differential control surfaces. You might be right regarding subs with Albacore hulls, they might have differential fins, but certainly not earlier submersibles like your traditional U-boats etc.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back