Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
ok, i guss this thread kinda turned into a argument, but i just wanted to share some research notes.
My friend Kathleen had barely a week in the Captain's chair of the EMB145 before she had her first all female crew. The FO and the flight attendants threw a party for her at the hotel, and carried out a ceremonial "clipping of the shirt tail", thus depriving her of a spare uniform shirt on the first day of a five day sequence.
It wasn't about respect, or desperation; it was an earned position.But they were the only country to respect women and not think that women couldn't handle it.
It wasn't about respect, or desperation; it was an earned position.
Women demanded to be treated as equals, and proved that they were capable.
There was initially a lot of resistance from military hierarchy that they had to overcome, and when they were first given the opportunity, it was in outdated trainer aircraft (Po-2). Imagine going into a bombing run in something like a Stearman, but slower. From the Night Witches squadron, they proved that they were capable, and earned their place in combat squadrons.
The Soviet "night witches" are extremely well known among aviation students--easily checked online. Probably rare to find aero fans who haven't heard of them
As for the Russians presumably displaying more respect for women than other nations: as properly noted on this thread, the reason females were committed to combat was that Moscow was short of MANpower. Something like 27 million Russian dead in the Great Patriotic War was roughly 15% of the population (itself a controversial topic, given inept prewar census taking, but I digress.)
I think you forget USSR was Communist. While it was nowhere near todays feminism levels it was still in their creed to promote equality.
Also part of the communist creed is that culpability for an action (or inaction) is based on the consequences of that action, not its intentions. Failure is a crime against the people and the state and its perpetrators must be liquidated. That's functionally true in our society as well, though we pretend otherwise. They, at least, were honest about it.One of the saddest stories I read was about several girls who were executed near Stalingrad in 1942. They served as ground observers on the left bank of Volga and allegedly they missed the bombers raid. 18 to 22 years old, no training, no equipment, living in foxholes in the steppes.
Yes, failure as a crime is the right formula. That principle was not proclaimed officially (at least after Stalin's era) but it was paramount. Not without the exceptions, of course.Also part of the communist creed is that culpability for an action (or inaction) is based on the consequences of that action, not its intentions. Failure is a crime against the people and the state and its perpetrators must be liquidated. That's functionally true in our society as well, though we pretend otherwise. They, at least, were honest about it.
Where did you get that from? The woman part?The nazis, among other things, forbade women from many occupations, largely relegating them to the domestic sphere. Restrictions keeping people in their place was, historically, one of the basic tenets of anti-liberal movements, of which nazism was a very extreme example, is that people should know their place. For women, that was at home, under control of husbands or fathers.
I was about to ask the same question, it seems that on the western front the Nazis were fighting Nazis, without reliable contraception it is very difficult for women not to have a "domestic role", The British had a policy that women should not be in combatant roles it isn't a "Nazi" idea.Where did you get that from? The woman part?
See The Perfect Nazi BrideWhere did you get that from? The woman part?
The nazis, among other things, forbade women from many occupations, largely relegating them to the domestic sphere. Restrictions keeping people in their place was, historically, one of the basic tenets of anti-liberal movements, of which nazism was a very extreme example, is that people should know their place. For women, that was at home, under control of husbands or fathers.
How many people today have read Orwell, do you (double) think?One of the pillars of the Soviet ideology was what Orwell brilliantly called doublethink.
Restrictions keeping people in their place was, historically, one of the basic tenets of anti-liberal movements, of which nazism was a very extreme example, is that people should know their place. For women, that was at home, under control of husbands or fathers.
The British had a policy that women should not be in combatant roles, it isn't a "Nazi" idea.
When it came to gender roles, the Nazis tended to be traditionalists. That doesn't mean that all traditionalists tended to be, ergo, Nazis.National Socialist ideology tended to idealise the female role as mothers for entirely sensible reasons that everyone atavistically understands.
How many people today have read Orwell, do you (double) think?