Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The article doesn't actually say that he was a corporal in the RAF; if he was Army, there'd be even less chance of them meeting.Why wouldn't they , I know the RAF is pretty snobbish but I can't say the same for other air arms I've been associated with
How about the story where the Italians are flying a captured P-38 to bait attack Allied bombers!
The article doesn't actually say that he was a corporal in the RAF; if he was Army, there'd be even less chance of them meeting.
Always curious about the Eagle Sqn as for there make up , what percentage of the pilots were RAF and what percent were RCAF ,
"The Japanese Zero fighter was a copy of a Western design."
Quite the contrary, as it had many technical innovations and was a completely original design.
John
One of my favourites....no tigers were knocked by the Allied AT fire in the whole of Normandy. They all ran out of petrol or were otherwise just abandoned.
I believe that one was started by one of our very own former members.....try and guess which one...
The USAAC tried a experiment on the heavy armed bomber approach. The B-40, a B-17 fitted with at least 18 .50's, with versions up to 30 guns, also versions with bigger than .50 cal. in some positions. Because of the extra turret drag a higher throttle position had to be used to keep up with the regular B-17's, so range was less. After the main formation had dropped it's bombs the B-40 couldn't keep up at all with the lightened B-17's.
One B-40 was damaged by flak, and then shot down by a Luftwaffe fighter. Not a success, no matter how you measure it. With the faults it had evident from the beginning, I wonder why they even tried it in combat. I guess it was the desperate times .
controversial....Seafires in 1945, in the pacific, opperating from the fleet carriers, had a staggeringly high accident rate