Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
really stupid reason for me actually. I'm abroad and only have an ipad with me an I hate typing on those things, thus I skipped most of my answer But you're absolutely right of course.Curious - why limit discussion regarding Strategic success to just Ploesti? The entire campaign against petro-chemical industry killed German fuel reserves...
Well, not necessarily as they were threatening the population weren't they? The German army could not ignore that despite their government's barbarism. Not sure how great an impact the relocation of AAA had on winning the war. But I'm playing the devil's advocate here as I don't really have an opinion on this discussion.Secondary benefits (unquestioned) were the re-allocation of AAA from German army to LW plus forcing Germany to allocate very high percentage of industrial resources (plant, labor, critical metals) toward fighter production to attempt to stop daylight bombing.
Had Daylight bombing and associated escort fighters not been considered threatening to German war machine they would have ignored it to the extent that they would a.) keep their resources mostly in the East, and b.) maintained aircraft production levels per 1942/early 1943.
Sorry there is no logic as you say in that. The Germans are not fanatical suicidal people that would need the whole country nuked to make them surrender.
There's that jet thing again. How could the jets available to the allies in 1945 have represented any counter to German jets over occupied Europe? It was years before a jet fighter with the range of a P 51 was built.
Do you believe that the European war would have ended in April 1945 had the USAAF not had the P-51?
Do you believe that Overlord would have gone ahead in June 1944 had the USAAF not had the P-51?
I agree that 1000 A4's with a Tabun warhead had not the same effect as a A-Bomb, but it's also not that difficult to built a fuze which will explode 50m over the ground, many constructed shells had simiular fuzes.
And one nuke over Hamburg would no do that ? Seriously...
Shells had time fuses. The V-2 flight path was not accurate enough to use a time fuse. It needed a radar fuse that Germany did not have.
And I agree with you that the German people was more easy to revolt against the government than Japan was, hence other good reason for the nuclear bombing.
Not trying to be a stick in the mud, but what have the last several pages got to do with "Top 10 Planes That Sealed Nazi Germany's Fate?" Maybe they deserve their own thread (anybody want to start it?), but they are sort of irrelevant to this one.
the mosquito was used in Pathfinder squadrons, arriving before the big guys to "mark" the target and thus making the whole bombing much more accurate.Okay, in a selfless attempt to get things back on track, I will now question the credentials of another frequent nominee, the Mosquito (thereby inevitably releasing another storm of vitriol)
Succesfiul as it was in such a range of roles, was anything the Mossie did really vital to the Allies? it was the Allies best night fighter/intruder for most of its existence, but were these roles vital? Other, admitedly lesser alternatives existed such as the Havoc and Beaufighter. The Mossie was a superlative high speed pinpoint bomber, but did it cause critical damage to the Germans?
The Mossie was certainly one of the best aircraft of the war, but was in the top 10 most important?
NBC - I'm being devil's advocate here - please don't firebomb my house
I dont believe the SBD and Privateer were used against the Germans.
Okay, in a selfless attempt to get things back on track, I will now question the credentials of another frequent nominee, the Mosquito (thereby inevitably releasing another storm of vitriol)
Succesfiul as it was in such a range of roles, was anything the Mossie did really vital to the Allies? it was the Allies best night fighter/intruder for most of its existence, but were these roles vital? Other, admitedly lesser alternatives existed such as the Havoc and Beaufighter. The Mossie was a superlative high speed pinpoint bomber, but did it cause critical damage to the Germans?
The Mossie was certainly one of the best aircraft of the war, but was in the top 10 most important?
NBC - I'm being devil's advocate here - please don't firebomb my house
The Mosquito:
1) Became the best scoring Allied night fighter of the war, in three different theatres
2) Took more PR photos than any RAF type (Spitfire few more sorties, bit didn't have as many cameras)
3) Dropped more bomb tonnage in RAF service than the Whitley, Hampden, Boston, Blenheim and Manchester, combined. Only the Stirling, Wellington, Halifax and Lancaster dropped more tonnage.
4) Served in every RAF theatre of war
5) Intercepted nearly 500 V1 flying bombs at night and was as up to five times more efficient in bombing V1 sights than other bomber types
6) Played a vital role in pathfinding, spoofing, jamming and laying false raid tracks to protect the bomber stream
7) Generally hit targets with at range iwth speed and precision unavailable to any other type.
I dont believe the SBD and Privateer were used against the Germans.