A guy in our unit was at a Land Combat Expo and got to shoot it and said he really liked it!
AND IN THIS CORNER: The Barrett M468......
- Thread starter lesofprimus
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
- Thread starter
- #22
lesofprimus
Brigadier General
I bet he did Adler.... Nice pic evan....
evangilder
"Shooter"
Thanks, Les. I get to show off the enemy's marksmanship with tha scar! Now that I think about it, maybe it was a lack of marksmanship, he didn't take me out of the fight, or even down.
P38 Pilot
Tech Sergeant
If you were in the military during the 80's, did you take part in the conflict with Panama?
evangilder
"Shooter"
Not me, that was after I did my time. I was in 84-88. I got into smaller skirmishes with the exception of April 15-16, 1986. I will let you look that one up. I will give you one hint, it was called operation El Dorado Canyon. Because of that, I am one of the few USAF vets that actually were awarded the Navy Meritorious Unit Citation.
I remember when that happened.
- Thread starter
- #27
lesofprimus
Brigadier General
I was in Panama P-38... Lots of fun down there....
One of our pilots jumped into Panama with 2nd Ranger Bat.
evangilder
"Shooter"
Yeah, you guys got into some fun in Panama, Les.
102first_hussars
Tech Sergeant
The M468 rifle is just an M-16 with a wider barrel, Stoner had already developed a 7.62mm M-16 a while back, its gonna be a ripoff I hope the U.S army is smart and goes with the XM-8.
- Thread starter
- #31
lesofprimus
Brigadier General
- Thread starter
- #32
lesofprimus
Brigadier General
No, it is a new reciever assembly that is still able to use all the M-16/M4 accessories, something your precious little XM-8 cant lay title to.... Its more cost effective to upgrade an existing weapon than replace it....
I should have figured you were involved in Operation El Dorado Canyon, Eric. It was quite stupid of me as I knew that F-111s from RAF Lakenheath took part in the operation and you were there at the time! 
Sorry to hear about your friends, les. I hope you more than made up for the loss.
Sorry to hear about your friends, les. I hope you more than made up for the loss.
evangilder
"Shooter"
Yep, I was on the Comm Support team for that. I got the full debrief after the op too. Nothing like pave-tack footage.
evangilder
"Shooter"
I remember the pattern being very busy that day. I was up in the tower during launch, and recovery. After launch, some came back. They sent up more than needed just in case. I do remember 4 111's would go out, then a tanker would pass over, 4 more, tanker, etc. It was pretty amazing to watch. Very well timed and orchestrated with radio silence until "feet wet". Then the channels went berserk.
I think there were four FB-111s that went up as reserve, if I remember correctly. As you were there, you'd know better naturally. The French wouldn't let the USAF fly over France, would they?
It was A-6s and F-111s mainly, wasn't it? I know they had a fair few tankers because of the long trip.
It was A-6s and F-111s mainly, wasn't it? I know they had a fair few tankers because of the long trip.
evangilder
"Shooter"
I wasn't aware of any FB-111s as I am pretty sure there weren't any in England stationed there permanently. There were F-111Es and EF-111 Ravens out of RAF Upper Heyford with the F-111Fs from RAF Lakenheath. Tankers came from RAF Mildenhall. The Navy Had A-6s for attack, while F-14s flew CAP for the raid. Several from Lakenheath and Heyford went up as extras in reserve. Those guys were not happy to return.
You are correct, no overflying France. As a matter of fact, no emergency landings either. A couple of guys made an emergency landing in Spain as the French wouldn't allow it. The F-111 that did not make it back, with Paul Lawrence and Fernando Ribas-Dominici were NOT shot down as some have reported. I personally knew the guy who led the raid, I flew with him for a check ride once and he saw what happened. As far as I know, he still wants his name confidential and I will honor that. He saw them turn to avoid a SAM and their wingtip hit a wavetop in the Gulf of Sitre. He saw them cartwheel across the top of the water as the plane broke up and exploded.
I don't know how much of the op has been declassified, so that is about all I can safely say at the moment.
You are correct, no overflying France. As a matter of fact, no emergency landings either. A couple of guys made an emergency landing in Spain as the French wouldn't allow it. The F-111 that did not make it back, with Paul Lawrence and Fernando Ribas-Dominici were NOT shot down as some have reported. I personally knew the guy who led the raid, I flew with him for a check ride once and he saw what happened. As far as I know, he still wants his name confidential and I will honor that. He saw them turn to avoid a SAM and their wingtip hit a wavetop in the Gulf of Sitre. He saw them cartwheel across the top of the water as the plane broke up and exploded.
I don't know how much of the op has been declassified, so that is about all I can safely say at the moment.
I was under the impression that FB-111s were involved, even more to the point I was under the impression the aircraft that was lost was a FB-111. As always though, I will take the word of someone who was actually involved over my scarce reading on the subject.
The tankers were from Mildenhall and Fairford, weren't they? I remember they converted a tanker for a operational command unit to control the USAF forces while the carrier USS America (?) was the operational command for the naval forces.
I suppose I should just look it up on the internet. But, as always it's interesting to hear from someone who was involved. And of course, don't want to step on the secrets - and, as you know, I'd never expect you to. I might not be in the military ...but I certainly have knowledge and respect enough to understand what did and "didn't" happen.
The tankers were from Mildenhall and Fairford, weren't they? I remember they converted a tanker for a operational command unit to control the USAF forces while the carrier USS America (?) was the operational command for the naval forces.
I suppose I should just look it up on the internet. But, as always it's interesting to hear from someone who was involved. And of course, don't want to step on the secrets - and, as you know, I'd never expect you to. I might not be in the military ...but I certainly have knowledge and respect enough to understand what did and "didn't" happen.
evangilder
"Shooter"
Well, I can definitely say that the one that was lost was an F-111F. There are some other facts about the crew that are quite interesting. Major Ribas almost always had some sort of problem on his aircraft, hot brakes, compressor stall, bird strike, etc. I personally watched him roll out on the runway and used the light gun to signal him out on the SOFs command. That was the first time that any of us could remember that he had a smooth takeoff and departure.
Sometimes, the F-111 in general was called an FB, but there are FB- models and just F- models. They often are mixed because the F-111 is not much of a fighter really. The FB is easily distinguished by a plexiglas panel on the bottom of the nose section, just behind the radome. Also FBs would often carry external fuel tanks that could be carried on the regular Fs, but most often were not.
You are correct about Fairford. I had forgotten about them as they were used for Heyford's birds mostly. As for what Navy ships were involved and their units, I am not sure. I think we got that in debrief, but that was almost 20 years ago and we weren't allowed to write anything down during the debrief. I am surprised I remember as much as I did!
Here is a picture of an FB with the panel that I mentioned above.
Sometimes, the F-111 in general was called an FB, but there are FB- models and just F- models. They often are mixed because the F-111 is not much of a fighter really. The FB is easily distinguished by a plexiglas panel on the bottom of the nose section, just behind the radome. Also FBs would often carry external fuel tanks that could be carried on the regular Fs, but most often were not.
You are correct about Fairford. I had forgotten about them as they were used for Heyford's birds mostly. As for what Navy ships were involved and their units, I am not sure. I think we got that in debrief, but that was almost 20 years ago and we weren't allowed to write anything down during the debrief. I am surprised I remember as much as I did!
Here is a picture of an FB with the panel that I mentioned above.
