Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I have to laugh when I read Shortround's post 33. There are ZERO fighters in the world that aren't part of a service "team." That was true even in WWI. The Red Barron didn't do his own aircraft maintenance. He didn't fuel it. He didn't clean it.
Not sure what is being said there since there aren't any completly independent military aircraft.
And comparing them to sports teams is spot on. Sometimes a team is well prepared and easily overcomes the opposition, Other times they manage to lose the game. all this with the same players and caoches. Sometimes they have a lopsided win and loss to the same team in teh same season.
Fighters pilots have good days and bad days, too.
I kinda got from SR was that the Navy "team" of 1944-45, when the F6F was flying, was much more experienced, trained, supported, and was a smoother operating machine than the Navy "team" of late '42 and '43, when the F4U was flying. Lots of lessons were learned post Pearl Harbor and 1944.I have to laugh when I read Shortround's post 33. There are ZERO fighters in the world that aren't part of a service "team." That was true even in WWI. The Red Barron didn't do his own aircraft maintenance. He didn't fuel it. He didn't clean it.
Perception and reality are rarely the same thing. There are many Brits especially the younger generation that think the Spitfire was our only fighter and the Lancaster was our only bomber.
As a British child I must say the Corsair figured more in post war movies probably because more were available as they were kept in service longer. As far as performance is concerned people frequently look at the best performance of a variant as typical. The double wasp Corsair was a beast and won post war races, it was a Corsair but only 10 were made. Militarily insignificant but a great addition to a legend.
They also had a good supply of spares for it [the Corsair] and the number required when not in a world wide war were well fitted to the number of avialable Corsairs.
Long range escort was still a problem due to fuel capacity and fuel efficiency, not to mention high optimal cruise speeds making close escort impractical for any extended period.As far as I know the piston engined aircraft was redundant in 1945 with the exception of those that had to operate from aircraft carriers. The hottest piston engined aircraft are generally maritime because of this Corsair Bearcat and Sea Fury spring to mind. There never was a "Fury" put into production.
Talking of Mr Brown, part of the reason for his huge number of carrier landings was sorting the problems of landing heavy and jet powered AC on carriers.
In point of fact, the F4U-4 was a better plane than the F6F-5 in late 1945. I don't know if the Hellcat could have jumped to new levels of performance had they made major improvements to it, but I'm sure it would have been an expensive development effort to make a Hellcat do what the F4U-4 and newer versions could do ... and the F4U-4 was already in production flying when the war ended, so there is no way to justify developing something you already have. Had I been making the choice of either the F4U-4 and F6F-5, I'd have chosen the F4U-4, too.