B-17vsLancaster

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

You notice? These are all Nine O Nine? Repetition is good 8)

EDIT: dang it, m8. you're belle wasn't there when I posted :lol:
 

Attachments

  • b17-b.jpg
    b17-b.jpg
    53.5 KB · Views: 989
  • nineonine.jpg
    nineonine.jpg
    21.6 KB · Views: 995
Do you suppose we're filling this thread so much with his dire enemy that it will become inhospitable to him? :lol: We're only making up for his Lanc sig. Every time he posts, he states an opinion ;)
 

Attachments

  • b17-909-mathis-01.jpg
    b17-909-mathis-01.jpg
    20.3 KB · Views: 983
Crazy said:
You notice? These are all Nine O Nine? Repetition is good 8)

EDIT: dang it, m8. you're belle wasn't there when I posted :lol:
o well more pics of the 17 the merrier :lol:
 

Attachments

  • b17_593.jpg
    b17_593.jpg
    25.8 KB · Views: 948
the lancaster kicks ass said:
you guys just can't hack it, the lanc was better............
nope
 

Attachments

  • wallpaper_belle_800.jpg
    wallpaper_belle_800.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 948
here my opinion of things:

the lanc was better as a bomber, but the b-17 was the better all-around plane :| (correct me if im wrong)
 
Best all-round would be the Corsair IMO. It could perform dive bombing, close air support, escort, interception, night fighting, photorecon, fighter sweeps, and most importantly, it could operate from carriers.

The Mosquito couldn't land on carriers (well, they could, but they probably would be pushed over the side afterwards) ;)
 
i agree that the lanc was a better bomber but the b-17 was a better plane
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back