- Thread starter
-
- #21
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
As I explained above, maybe someone had his family tree decimated by the SS, and finds it very offensive.... U never know, but I dont find the swastica offensive as u asked....Twitch said:Hey SS Tiger! I curious as to how the hell anyone on a WW 2 fan site and object to the screen name SS Tiger.
Well it is very common that many people don't have clue what the Nazi Germany in fact represented. It was surely one of the evilest forces in the human history. And thus (the SS Gruppen were the "elite" forces of that regime), its only goal was to destroy. In fact, its goal was just as the same as the goals of militant Islam. To set up a new world order.What about the divisions that didn't commit any war crimes?
We discussed this numerous times before... Read older threads.Pisis mate, please it is not something to fight over or just be rude to someone just because of their name. Everyone knows him as SS Tiger and I really do not think it is a thing to go over board with. The Union Jack flack were flapping in the wind over the Consentration camps in South Africa during the Boer war, does that mean I must find it offensive. Some of my family died in those camps, but his is in my eyes just something being thrown over board.
If the Swastika or anything relating to the SS or Nazis should be banned then the Union Jack should get the same treatment for all the things that happend under the Union Jack.
So lets stop fighting over bullshit.
Henk
OK, that sounds fair.The problem has been taken care of, and a new member, TIGER, will be coming soon....