Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
the lancaster kicks ass said:ah, well i can't speak for the canadian lanc but the RAF operated lanc i believe they installed the second set of controlls volentarily due to the immense value of the aircraft
pbfoot said:from my point of view they probably require 1 pilot if it was an NCO in command or two commissioned otherwise
FLYBOYJ said:pbfoot said:from my point of view they probably require 1 pilot if it was an NCO in command or two commissioned otherwise
RCAF too.wmaxt said:A lot of enlisted flew in combat in WWII for both the USN and the RAF. They did as well as any of the officers.
wmaxt
FLYBOYJ said:I flew a T-34 in an airshow at the base I used to drill at when I was in the naval reserve. My maintenance chief allowed that to count as a drill weekend. I wore an enlisted flight suit with my name tage indicating my rank (Petty Officer 2nd Class). 3/4 of the officers couldn't believe that an enlisted puke could fly! They were pissed cause I got to go into the VIP area - I told them "Sir if more NCOs were pilots, it would give you more time to do your - paperwork - correctly."Sir!
the lancaster kicks ass said:so are the bulk of us agreed on
1) B-29
2) Lanc
so then, 3rd?
FLYBOYJ said:the lancaster kicks ass said:so are the bulk of us agreed on
1) B-29
2) Lanc
so then, 3rd?
B-17 - The documented evidence of how much battle damage it could absorb is renowned. Even die-hard B-24 drivers will admit the B-17 was a better flier. The B-24 did offer some advantages, but it was the B-17 that took the fight of the USAAF to Germany with the B-24 just a RCH behind....
3) B-17
4) B-24
Each crew member volunteered for aircrew duties. None were conscripted into their jobs.