Best Bomber of ww2

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

No, that's what National Insurance goes towards - LG. See, we pay National Insurance on our income. That's why people who don't work are dirty scabs because those who do work pay for their health care. So, again, the Fuel tax funds goes to those nice Iraqis...
 
Lightning Guy said:
No way should any version of the He-111 be considered in this conversation.

And don't forget that tax pounds that go towards socialized health care.
Click to expand...

oh i'm terably sorry sir , when you think about it , a b-17G could only carry about 8000 Kg's , it had for engines and was made later in the war , so ,their
 
Umm, the first flight of the He-111 was in February of 1935, the B-17 (Boeing model 299) first flew on July 28, 1935. They are almost identical in age. The He-111 is a medium bomber, the B-17 a heavy. 8,000 kg is a pretty big payload for that timeframe. The bombload on the 111 was about 2,000 kg and the bomb-bay configuration was such that the biggest bomb that could be put in there was 250kg in a tail down position! (Vertical bomb racks).
 
Yes but im sure the H-6 carried 2 SC2000 , which is about 4000kg , i was just saying that a 1941 B-17 probably the D , could,t/didn't carry 4000kg's
 
Partly a question of weight to range. The longer to go, more fuel, hence more weight for fuel, less for bombs. A 1941 B-17 had not even seen combat yet to be able to be really battle tested. B-17's didn't even get to England until the Summer of 1942. The standard bombload on a B-17D was 4,800 lbs (Typical). While the H6 version of the He-111 could carry a couple of torpedoes and quite a bit of weight, the range with that much range would be significantly reduced.
 
The He-111 couldn't even begin to compare with the B-17 in any sort of payload/range competition. Nor could it match the B-17 in altitude or bombing accuracy. And let's not even get started in defensive capabilities.
 
the lancaster kicks ass said:
sory, meant to say 2,000lbs, rediculously little...............
Click to expand...

Sorry it was 4,000lbs min for the long range missions, still not much for a heavy bomber with 10 men but that was the way of it.
 
Lightning Guy said:
The He-111 couldn't even begin to compare with the B-17 in any sort of payload/range competition. Nor could it match the B-17 in altitude or bombing accuracy. And let's not even get started in defensive capabilities.
Click to expand...

sure the b-17 was definately a fortress , but sticking 12 gunners in a plane doesnt make it untouchable (i know the B-17 didnt have twelve gunners btw )
 
Maybe the He-111 should get a little prize for being in active service for so long, the Ju-88 for being the best all-rounder of the Luftwaffe bombers, but all this was one of Hitler's biggest mistakes really, in that he obstructed their aircraft industry so much, they never really finalised and produced a seriously heavy-bomber, and they did have a coupla doozies in the pipeline too......
 

Attachments

  • raf_487__nz__sqn._-_on_the_hunt..._194.jpg
    16 KB · Views: 516
The He-111 did serve for a very long time and that is to be commended, but then, what else did the Luftwaffe really have?
 
An elastic band and a pencil. By 1943 the Germans didn't really have much use for a heavy bomber though, except maybe to bomb Russia.
 

He-177 was a poor excuse for a H' Bomber ,
a 4 engined He-111 with a bigger fuselage might have been good for a H' Bomber , but the He-111 Z wasnt a good idea in my oppion , i'd be shocked if a fighter missed one of them it was that wide
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

  • Locked
Attempted assassination of Trump.
Replies
2
Views
2K
DerAdlerIstGelandet
CANADA BANS 1500 TYPES OF ASSAULT WEAPONS IMMEDIATELY
2 3
Replies
47
Views
8K
Dana Bell
D
  • Locked
Charity Auction for Signed Copy of Finish Forty and Home
Replies
2
Views
3K
ccheese
WW2 career, plausible postings/dates.
Replies
0
Views
3K
Tony Hill
L
  • Locked
What Criteria should be used for determining the best land based piston fighter
9 10 11
Replies
218
Views
38K
Lighthunmust
L
Menu
Log in
Register