Best Dogfighter Poll Revisited...

Best Dogfighter Between 15,000 - 35,000 feet......


  • Total voters
    177

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

That may well be, but the Spit could fly rings around the Hurricane.
 
Lightning Guy said:
That may well be, but the Spit could fly rings around the Hurricane.
No, that was the one thing a Spitfire couldn't do against a Hurricane...Anything else it was far better at, but it couldn't out turn a Hurricane.....
 
"With over 15,000 Hurricanes built, the aircraft served on virtually every front; even remaining in front-line service as a ground-attack aircraft well after production ended. During the Battle of Britain, the Hurricane downed more Luftwaffe aircraft than any other aircraft type, accruing over 1,500 confirmed victories.

Despite its record, the Hurricane is slow, under-powered, maneuvers poorly, and lacks acceleration. The early Bf109s and Bf110s had little problem contending with the Hurricane. During the Battle of Britain, the Hurricane's main advantage came from fighting over friendly territory against opponents operating at the very edge of their combat range. On the average, though, the Hurricane was outclassed by most of its air-to-air opponents.

The Hurricane is a relatively stable aircraft and generally less difficult to fly than the Spitfire. The Hurricane reaches maximum power between 16,000 to 18,000 feet, but performance falls off sharply above 18,000 feet. Typically, the Hurricane should engage inbound bombers while Spitfires engage the escorting Bf109s."
 
Notes: Once the aircraft caught fire, it was quickly engulfed in flames. Many pilots suffered the effects of 'Hurricane burns'. The Hurricane is only capable of being flown in a clean configuration.
 
Adolf Galland said:
"With over 15,000 Hurricanes built, the aircraft served on virtually every front; even remaining in front-line service as a ground-attack aircraft well after production ended. During the Battle of Britain, the Hurricane downed more Luftwaffe aircraft than any other aircraft type, accruing over 1,500 confirmed victories.
according to some sources I've seen the Hurricane was the most successful Allied fighter in WW2 for air victories (though I myself think that might be going a little to far)
Despite its record, the Hurricane is slow, under-powered, maneuvers poorly, and lacks acceleration.
What a load of nonsense.
As the war progressed other fighters did out pace the Hurricane in performance, but at the start it was a very good aircraft..... as for 'maneuvers poorly'.... I'm sorry but whoever wrote that doesn't have a clue
The early Bf109s and Bf110s had little problem contending with the Hurricane.
While the Bf 109 was better than the Hurricane in the BOB, it wasn't that better.
As for the Bf 110 having little problem with the Hurricane....LOL
In the BOB the Bf 110 had to be escorted by the Bf 109 to protect it from the Hurricane
During the Battle of Britain, the Hurricane's main advantage came from fighting over friendly territory against opponents operating at the very edge of their combat range.
Seeing that the Hurricane Squadrons fought the Luftwaffe raids as soon as they crossed the Channel, thats nonsense.
On the average, though, the Hurricane was outclassed by most of its air-to-air opponents.
No, from 39-41 the only axis aircraft that outclassed it, was the Bf 109.
The Hurricane is a relatively stable aircraft and generally less difficult to fly than the Spitfire.
Both aircraft are noted for being easy to fly.
 
Adolf Galland wrote:
The Hurricane is only capable of being flown in a clean configuration.

Sorry, but I don't follow this
What do you mean?
_________________
If in doubt........Panic!!!!!!!
That means that the Hurricane can only be flown without any external weapon in BoB.
 
External weapons on a Hurricane?? What does that have to do with ur post???
Once the aircraft caught fire, it was quickly engulfed in flames. Many pilots suffered the effects of 'Hurricane burns'. The Hurricane is only capable of being flown in a clean configuration.
It sounds like u are talking about the plane either being in flames, or pieces were missing....
Where did the external weaps come from???
 
and about the spit...

"The Spitfire was conceived about the time that the importance of speed and climb rate was being discovered. Subsequently, the early Spitfires were rather slow with poor climb rates, but (being very light weight) possessed excellent turn performance."
 
The Spitfire Ia and the early Bf109 are well-matched, with the 109 being slightly faster in level flight and accelerating quicker in a dive. At slow speeds, however, the Spitfire is much more maneuverable and rolls faster than the 109. The Spitfire Ia suffers at high altitude, however, with the Bf109E clearly superior above 20,000 feet. The Spitfire Ia is under armed; its light punch can't guarantee lethality against targets with self-sealing fuel tanks (such as the He111 bomber). Further, the Spitfire Ia's carburated engine will cut out under negative G, something the fuel-injected Bf109 doesn't have to worry about. The Spitfire Ia must watch out for high-speed bandits diving from above, and generally needs to sucker the opponent into a low-speed turning fight.
 
Turn performance is good, but being slower meant that the enemy could generally dictate the terms of the fight, disengaging at will. Subsequently, later Spitfires added emphasis on speed. The Spitfire IX is generally 20% faster at all altitudes, accelerates better, and climbs faster than earlier variants. It can still dominate the low-speed turning fight against a 109, but also has the option of diving away and escaping a battle. Lastly, the Spitfire IX packs more punch, carrying two 20mm cannons and four .303cal machine guns.

Faster German planes, like the Fw190, again called for a faster Spitfire. The Spitfire XIV, weighing some 8,400 pounds compared to the Spitfire Ia's 5,700, is substantially faster than the IX, performing better at all altitudes. The XIV can meet any Luftwaffe fighter on equal terms with the exception of the significantly-faster Me262 jet."

Is the site wrong about the Spitfire?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back