Did the Henley have dive brakes? If not, then it wasn't really in the running to replace the Skua. OTOH, it might have replaced the Fulmar, but the prototype Fulmar (P.4/34) was also somewhat faster than the production Fulmar, and lost about 30mph after it was fully navalized.
Dive-brakes? Maybe, maybe not - perhaps the Air Ministry decision not to proceed with the light-bomber requrement means that that part of the prototype development has occured yet. But no doubt if (and they would) the FAA wanted dive-brakes, Hawkers would have them fitted.
The question then, would be with a more effective FDB in the offing, would the FAA still want an eight-gun Fighter (re-con) aircraft - the decision making timing is tight. I can see the Henley having four guns - like the Skua, but not eight - its main duty is a dive-bomber. And according to 'Dive Bomber!' p.51 "with capacity for four 500 lb bombs on underwing racks".
OTOH it gives a window of opportunity, for the FAA to go to single-engine fighters, rather than two-seaters.