Lucky13
Forum Mascot
Then the JAS 39E/F, would be one h*lluva advanced 'overpriced 80's fighter', if you look what their NG airframe (future E/F) has, or can do and they're constantly develop it....
Much like in the case of the F-18 E/F Superhornet, bigger this, that, longer range than they expected, to mention one, another super cruise at Mach 1.2 or if it was 1.3....
Used to work for a company in Sweden, that did a lot of work for and with the Gripen team.
As you already know, F-18 E/F's engine, Volvo helped develop General Electric F404, now F414-GE-400 and it seems to be a good engine....
Have to say, they've done good, 50% more fuel, lower fuel consumption, longer range, more hardpoints etc., etc...not bad for a '80's overpriced fighter...'
Besides, how many JAS 39 E/F do you get for a F-35?
The F-35 is probably outdated now as well!
Much like in the case of the F-18 E/F Superhornet, bigger this, that, longer range than they expected, to mention one, another super cruise at Mach 1.2 or if it was 1.3....
Used to work for a company in Sweden, that did a lot of work for and with the Gripen team.
As you already know, F-18 E/F's engine, Volvo helped develop General Electric F404, now F414-GE-400 and it seems to be a good engine....
Have to say, they've done good, 50% more fuel, lower fuel consumption, longer range, more hardpoints etc., etc...not bad for a '80's overpriced fighter...'
Besides, how many JAS 39 E/F do you get for a F-35?
The F-35 is probably outdated now as well!