British Sailors seized by Iran.

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

The United Kingdom of Great Britain is weak. ​

The last time the British government stood up to be counted was in 1982 when Prime Minister Thatcher ordered our fleet to the Falklands. That was a simple case of "the mouse that roared", when a mouse roars it gets squashed. But now a rat, Iran, has roared and Britain has found no guts inside itself, all that British spirit has been dilluted and the passion of "Rule Brittania" is gone. Iran has squared up and Britain is backing away.

The world is laughing at us, and I don't blame them. This country is full of people who act twenty when they're thirteen and act twelve when they're twenty. They believe bravery is fighting in the street, and call themselves soldiers because they carry a knife. But when the real world looks upon them, the people either hide or call for the U.S.

The people who call for the U.S are the same people that "hate" America. They don't know why but they live off some stupid idea that Americans are loud, so they're as*holes. They don't realise they are the arrogant ones, at least America has a reason to be arrogant. We shout ... but can't bite.

The only country really left in this world that will stand up for what is right in its own eyes, whether you like it or not, is America. Even if you don't agree with the U.S foreign policy AT LEAST it's got the balls to put force behind its beliefs. Britain hasn't. We're cowards! We go on and on about British spirit that's unbreakable, it's not 1940 anymore! We've lost that spirit, it's all half caste babies and Manchester Utd. now.
 
The British economy is the 5th largest in the world. Their military is the 28th. In 1990, the RAF had 90,000 personnel. Today they have 40,000. America, The United States, the US of A would fall on its sword for the UK.

Not sure if the UK would do the same for us based upon what I read.


The UK and the US are the last bastions. If we fall. We ALL fall.
 

- Our military is a shambles. We would still follow the USA though, just look at Iraq. Only our attempt would be pitiful compared to size of the Marines.
- The Germans should be able to fight, but they're not allowed. Hasn't that treaty bitten us on the arse?
- Oh and one British aircraft carrier (the name escapes me), due to 'monetary restrictions' only has enough fuel for one of it's engines so limps around at half speed. How sad is that?
- There may be much patriotism here, but if you went to Britain, I think you would (unfortunatley) be suprised at how dissapointment there is in the government and country as a whole.
 
Have to agree with some of the comments from Plan D and Ajax. Patriotism is for a football and not a nation. Christ on a recent quiz in my place of work they didn't even know that the BOB was fought with planes(not to mention which war it was!!!!). But ask some trival sh%t about Liverpool and Everton FC......

I see David Beckham is now flying the flag for British masculinity in the US along with his skinny pouting and very talented wife(Proudly admitted once she had never read a single book in her life after publishing her autobiography).

"Well. Irrespective. We have your back. `" Cheers Matt
 

This is not war? Are you serious? I'm not sure what you would call a war, Simon. We've lost many brothers and sisters in arms over there. Guess what pal, they aren't going to Iraq and having a tea party. Unless you are a veteran that has spent time in zone - who are you to say it's not war? Every fellow Marine, soldier, sailor, and airmen I know that has been in the sandbox will say it is a war. As soon as they pin wings on my chest the Marines have promised to send me in zone also. Again, may I ask, WHO ARE YOU? Your post smacks of arrogance and niavete. Why would you just assume that you are more intelligent than anyone?

By the way - capturing an operative and uniformed military personnel are vastly different. But, since you are intelligent, you probably already knew that. What would you say would be a proper course to take if king xerxes decided to put these sailors/marines on trial? Continue to wait for perfect timing?
 

Exactly and that is why his post pissed me off. To say that it is not a war over there and that is not "rough" eneogh! Who the hell is he to say that. I was there, I know what it is like. I have lost comrads over there.

Bomber do me a favor and watch this video of my unit when we were in Iraq and then you tell the families that it was not "rough" over there. I would gladly give you some addresses but you would not have the balls to do it.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tpD8iqkvZ4
 
Matt308 said:
I say give the Iranians what they want.
Click to expand...

What is it that they want? Do you think it's the Bomb? Do they want control of the Persian Gulf? Great Arabia?

Not dissin' ya', just trying to figure out what the Persians want? It most certainly isn't 15 British Marines who are on patrol. Everybody on this board knows that this a political grandstanding event. Juxtipose the Iranians actions with the Swiss Army contingent that wandered a mile into a neighboring country before realizing it and heading back. Nobody noticed and would have noticed had the Swiss not said something.

What's the greater goal of the Iranians? What is their plan?
 

They probably want the release of the Iranians that were captured in Iraq, but that's not going to happen

In an extract from a poem by the great Jeremy Clarkson;
 
"Well. Irrespective. We have your back."

No you don't. The U.S has never backed Great Britain up in any situation that didn't aid them. Never has the U.S sent a military task force to aid Great Britain in her own wars.

Where was the U.S when Great Britain was fighting her war on terrorism against the IRA? Where was the American sword when Argentina invaded the Falklands?

As much as you may like to believe it, Matt, the U.S isn't propping Great Britain up. They haven't always got our back and we haven't always got the U.S back.

The fact of the matter is, in the last twenty years it's been Great Britain aiding America in her wars. It may always be a case of Collie helping the Rotweiler but at least we're there, everytime.

My country may be full of pompous little scrubbers, but at least there's something in the country that throws our military to help our greatest friends in the world, the U.S.A. So, don't start getting this stupid arrogant idea that the USA will always help Britain, and Britain doesn't seem like it would return the favour.

"Not sure if the UK would do the same for us based upon what I read."

Ever since the War of 1812, Britain and America have been alongside each other in almost every war they've fought in. So, pull your head out of your arse and realise Britain has done, and will continue to do so... you should be more grateful because now the country is full of sh*t - so there's even less people here willing to help you.

Great Britain and the U.S.A is the greatest alliance in history. Luckily stupid public opinion of one another hasn't broken that.
 
These rug weaving bad boys have caused enough trouble, all in the name of nuclear aspiration. I say the U.K/ U.S join together, to sponsor their fissile fetish. We send them a couple dozen warheads, via air delivery. They should get them in 10-20 minutes. Heh heh heh.
 


How did you do that fissile typo? The f is miles away from the m...

I think the best idea was the 48hr ultimatum. If they don't give up then, negotiating will have been pointless anyways.
 
Plan D - I see where you're coming from, but I have a couple comments. First of all, all nations act in self-interest. Sometimes that self-interest falls in-line with aiding another nation. Very rarely will a nation take action if it feels this course of action is detrimental. Fortunately, US and UK interests have long coincided. However, I don't think the examples of Falklands and IRA fit this, nor do I think the UK should have expected I want to believe that if the UK became invovled in a major conflict, the US would not let Britain go south, as what's good for her is often good for the US. Hopefully those in Britain and the US that see the threats of radical islam as a cultural threat to the west will really start making themselves heard.

I don't think the US could have, nor should have gotten involved with Troubles, or anything else to do w/ the IRA. That's an internal affair for the UK to deal with. Such a move would incur the wrath of a large part of America as well. Much of the northeast US sympathizes with the Republican cause, even if they don't support IRA operations - particularly as they took an increasingly large toll of civilians.

With regard to the falklands, it was a territorial dispute between Britain and Argentina. She had to deal with the situation herself, and the matter did not concern the US. Not to mention, she obviously did not need any military assistance from the US. In some instances, I think that a political blessing or approval is sufficient. Can you think of how weak the UK would have looked if US carrier groups steamed south and participated in the counter-attack, along with marine BLTs storming ashores and soldiers taking to the fray.
 
I admit my reply wasn't well thought out. And in actual fact I would have never expected U.S aid against the IRA or in the Falklands conflict beyond what was handed to us. However, I did make the comment that Britain doesn't act on behalf of the U.S. For me to believe that nations act in anything other than self-interest is naive, and I recognise that.

"America, The United States, the US of A would fall on its sword for the UK.
Not sure if the UK would do the same for us based upon what I read."

The quote above got to me though. The USA would not fall on its sword for the U.K nor would the U.K fall on its sword for the USA. That comment just annoyed me, I was a little out of line.
 
HaWk3r T3mP3sT said:
Oi its war now! did you see that angry mob yelling out death to britain and america?
Click to expand...

They were college idiots who had been fed propoganda by president i'm-really-a-member-of-jihad or watever his name is outside the British embassy. They all think that the sun shines out of Iran's arse and staged it to keep things confrontational (and halt some of the diplomacy)
 
Ohhh I'm convinced now that people are shouting death to Britian that it's a war...

Thanks for clearing that up...

Soilders dieing doesn't constitute a war.. it's an occupational hazzard.
Soilders getting taken hostage doesn't constitute a war, it's another occupational hazzard..

But I think steaming your fleet in there, guns ablazin, or as has been called for on here (without any rebuke) using nuclear weapons most certainly does...

Plan-D good climb down there... and yes what more could the British people want from America in it's own decades long fight against terrosism ? Apart from stoping sending the IRA money and arms, their politicians supporting IRA fund raising rallys ?

Did you notice how as soon as this dried up following 9/11 how quickly the terrosism stoped ?

What I object to most is the goading of British public opinions and forces to start another conflict in the region by non British persons... who should keep their noses out of it...

If the American people want a war with Muslims of the world, then they should do it themselves... because I suspect that's whats going to happen if anyone steams into Iran, The moderate muslim countries governments will have no choice but to listen to their public.

You think this is a war ?.... ohh it will be then that is for sure.

Invade a single county run by a dictator to free it's people is one thing, but attack a democtratic muslim country because it wants nothing more than to have the same nuclear capablity as ourselves is another... and that would be the reason behind attacking, don't think in nievety it's the 15 sailors, because we'd never see them aliive again.

I'm sorry if not having been in the military means that I don't have an opinion in your eyes as to what constitutes a war..

I'm just Dad of 42 to a boy of 13... and if talking can get those sailors home without having to go to WWIII then I say we talk a lot longer than 48 hours !

Simon
 
but attack a democtratic muslim country because it wants nothing more than to have the same nuclear capablity as ourselves is another...
Click to expand...
Are u fu*cking stoopid pal??? A Democratic country RUN BY A FU*CKING TERRORIST.... One who wishes to wipe Israel off the map....

That doesnt sound scary to u???

If not it should...
and if talking can get those sailors home without having to go to WWIII then I say we talk a lot longer than 48 hours !
Click to expand...
I agree with u there... But that doesnt stop u from droppin in some SAS boys to "scope" things out a bit and get ready for the next "step" in negotiations....
 
Look at this:

They change their story so it looks like what the've done is legal, then get all 15 servicemen to confess. This isn't right...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

Iran government about to collapse
Replies
9
Views
3K
B-17engineer
C
Iran test-fires advanced missile
Replies
1
Views
1K
vikingBerserker
British Sniper sets new kill record
2
Replies
28
Views
5K
Night Fighter Nut
Who's Killing Iran's Nuke Scientists?
2 3
Replies
46
Views
13K
razor1uk
Afganistan "trap" for US by Al-Qaeda?
Replies
4
Views
2K
stasoid
S
Menu
Log in
Register