From your collection? If its that important to you why are you posting it on the Internet?
I share my photo collection how I see fit, on the net and in print. The more folks who get to see this kind of thing, the better.
That is what is most important to me, and
that is why I choose to post some of my collection on the internet. Please do not misunderstand; I do not mind that people take images I have posted on the net and post them elsewhere,
so long as credit is given. It's a very simple and plain matter of courtesy. If you find an image on the internet, or take it from another source, such as a book or magazine, and present it elsewhere, the least you can do is
mention the source.
Unfortunately, in this day and age courtesy is a quality all too lacking, especially when it is so easy to grab an image from one place (in this case, a website) and put it someplace else. Perhaps it's just a case of oversight, something which we are all capable of. But that in itself is a form of discourtesy. I myself have posted images, forgetting to furnish a credit. I usually rectify it as soon as I realize what I've done, but I have in fact done it and can understand when it happens. A large number of people on forums are in a constant race to post the coolest stuff, and quite often do not think to post the source of said stuff. They simply say "look what I found!".
In this case, I happened to come across an apparent oversight and said something about it. Am I angry? No, but I am naturally disappointed.
Do you have the copyright SHS ?
The issue of copyright is not the issue of dispute in this instance. I do not own copyright to the photo because, 1) I am not James Weir and 2) I have not taken legal steps to acquire rights to the photo. I have, however, been given the green light to use the photo however I see fit. More on this below...
Was said James Weir's function during the occupation to take photos?
To be honest, I do not know much about the man. I have never met him and my only "contact" with him, if you want to call it that, was through the individual from whom I received the slide and who merely relayed Mr. Weir's wishes that any of his photos used for whatever purpose be credited to him. I do know that he was a member of the USAAF, but would have to say that he most likely was not an official AAF photographer. The overwhelming majority of official government photography from that period in time was done with black and white film.
Unless you are James Weir, why do you deserve credit for the image?
Do not mistake claim of copyright with a photo/image credit, as the majority of people do. As I've stated, I do not claim copyright to this photo. But I do claim credit for the image that is presented here in this thread, which was most probably taken from a page on my website.
A photo/image credit is like a family tree, and should include information as to the originating photographer as well as whoever else was instrumental in bringing a given photo or image to light for the masses to see.
In this instance, the originating photographer was James Weir. The slide from which the image in question originated is in my possession, and I am the individual who scanned said slide. I went through the trouble to clean up the resulting image and then post it on my website as well as on a few forums to share with others. (Some of which you yourself frequent, Eric, including WIX.) Wherever I have posted this image, mention has been made of the originating photographer as well as my own by-line, when appropriate.
The bottom line is the fact that the individual who posted the image here in this thread
should have stated that he found it on a given website or forum, but did not. If he could not remember where it was found, this should have been stated. Again, it's a matter of courtesy. And again, I'm not angry about this, just a tad miffed. I merely wish to see that credit is given where it is due.