Birdmanwest
Airman
- 15
- Feb 10, 2004
Secret Weapons Over Normandy is the best airplane game out there for a WW2 aircraft fans like us.
http://www.lucasarts.com/products/normandy/
http://www.lucasarts.com/products/normandy/
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
GermansRGeniuses said:i dont like msoft sims because u have to pick what ordanance u want unlike il2 where there is a rocket a bomb a mg and a cannon button and the flight model is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay crappy compared to il2 graphics too sure cfs3 has better gfx but thats cuz its only a couple months old the original il2 is over two years old and the graphics still kick ass! fb is even better plus lets not forget the damage model we all love so much
nutter said:FB will never come out for anything other than the p.c. ps2 and xbox wouldn't be able to handle it.
that secret weapons games got a lot of flyable planes but the graphucs looked a bit cheap to me so i won't be buying it. still nice to see some competition
Personally I like cycling through weapons somewhat because its more along the lines of arming it than just firing it off.GermansRGeniuses said:i dont like msoft sims because u have to pick what ordanance u want unlike il2 where there is a rocket a bomb a mg and a cannon button
Yes, the stock flight model is a bunch of BS, but the avhistory.org planes are fun to fly.the flight model is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay crappy compared to il2
IL-2 definately has the graphics over CFS2, but if the graphics are okay thats fine by me. My opinion of CFS3 is that its pretty horrible. I only played IL-2 once, and I wasn't too impressed with the flight model (I took off and climbed a few thousand feet before deciding the graphics that it was set on sucked and didn't feel like changing them). From the shots of FB though, the graphics are great (especially the effects).graphics too sure cfs3 has better gfx but thats cuz its only a couple months old the original il2 is over two years old and the graphics still kick ass!
from olegSo, finally we have 112 flyables in FB + AEP.
We did for all "missed" in the past important flyable aircraft the complex damage model.
And we have over 150 aircraft in total...
As much as I don't like CFS3, it supports add-on aircraft and checks them for online play (too much IMO, since you can't change your gun convergence range and play online if others dont have the same change).IL-2 doesn't support add-ons because it would make online flight almost impossible, with everyone having slighty different plane sets than the next guy.
I don't actually want to use them, but its nice to know you can "fly" a tank, ship, or artillery in CFS2. It's nice that FB has actual tank battles (**** (oops) it, I almost want to buy FB to watch the tank battles ). CFS2 doesn't have tank battles/naval bombardments which sorta sucks.If you're looking for artillery and tanks for sceney and realistic tank-battles with air cover, IL-2 has you covered If you actually want to control them, may I suggest Battlefield 1942?
What can it do? CFS2 has a great mission builder that I personally find easy to use (and if I ever both to learn the keystrokes it'll be better) but due to CFS2's halfassed online play complex missions are generally for SP.IL-2 also includes this neat feature called the FMB (Full mission builder) where the versatility is tremendous. There are an abundance of missions, because one doesn't have to be a genius to work it.
Yup, it has all sorts of features that are great - IMO the best are MP ordnance, ground units fighting, etc - but like all games it has some bad things about it too. Sadly MS left some blatantly obvious MP features out of CFS2 that make it not nearly as good as it could be. But I still can't say IL-2 FB is more than okay, since it ain't the PTOAll in all, IL-2 is the best flight sim out there. (And that;s only slightly baised)