Shortround6
Lieutenant General
The P-40Cs/Tomahawk IIBs were rigged for the 52 gal drop tank, in large part to make up for the smaller fuel capacity of the self-sealing tanks. The long nose P-40s were rigged with the underwing small bomb racks, although seldom used? This seems to have been very much a doctrine decision by the USAAC. Curtiss was advertising a bewildering array of bomb combinations (including a 500lb on center line) on the export Hawk 75s but only a few minor countries took them up on it.I agree the heavier wing bombs on a P-40 (D onward) were a gradual development, but as soon as you could put a 50 gallon fuel tank on the centerline (earliest production version of P-40D) you can carry about a 300 lb bomb for sure, and it turned out pretty quickly that you can also carry about a 500 lb bomb. The fuel tank system has a release switch to ditch the external tank. Needless to say that also works for a bomb, so all you have left to do is rig something to arm the bomb which seems to have been done various ways.
Tomahawks may or may not have had the small under wing racks and/or releases/triggers/safeties installed.
I said it was confusing
British and American bombs (and French) were not standardized at this point (1940-41) in regards to bomb lugs and spacing. British 20lb bomb probably did not fit a rack built for US 20lb bombs? Yes, ground crew were inventive.
500lb seems to be a decent standard.................however...............British 250lb bombs are below standard as were British 500lb GP bombs.SBDs did plenty of harm with 500 lb bombs on Japanese ships, and Vals did even worse on US and British ships.
early British 250lbs held about 68lbs of HE and the early 500lb GP bombs held about 140lb HE. US and Japanese (and German) GP bombs held closer to 50% HE instead of 27-29%.
That is the real problem with using single engine army planes for this mission. SBD-3 Jan 1941 manual (up-dated later) calls for 100 gal fuel with 1000lb bomb and 140 gals with 500lb bomb and 150-260 gal for scout missions. This was all internal and is the capacity for the protected tanks.But range would be limited with external bombs. That's the real limitation here.
Covered by others. Beaufighters got bombs but rather late.Two other types that came to mind are the Whirlwind (as a coastal defense fighter and strafer) and a Martin Maryland, which they did have available quite early. Doesn't carry a huge bomb load but it is fast and has a long range, and what bombs it does carry can go in the bomb bay I think. If you don't want the Whirlwind (I can hear complaints already) send some Beaufighters, they were already around. Beaufighters had enough speed down low that they could tangle with Zeros and sometimes came out on top, plus plenty firepower (and more ammunition than Whirlwind) to strafe ships.
And that is the major problem with the single (or two?) squadrons of airplanes putting a major hurt on the Japanese off of Ceylon in early 1942. Granted there were only a few air forces (or more properly a few local commanders) in the world that thought that escort fighters were essential for strike success. Even the US at Midway was not allocating enough escorts.The problem with all these light bomber types is that without fighter escort their losses were heavy. 11 squadron Blenheims got lucky when they attacked the IJN in 1942, remaining undetected until they dropped their bombs. But once the IJN fighters got their act together 5 of the 9 attacking Blenheimscwere shot down.