**** DONE: GB-44 1/48 RF-101C - Military A/C of post-war time

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Donivanp

Major
9,604
8,298
Feb 23, 2014
Katy Texas
Username : donivanp
First name : Don
Category : intermediate
Scale : 1/48
Manufacturer / Model : Kitty Hawk RF-101C&G/H
Extras : Extra decals (not sure yet which I'll use) Possible use of resin exhaust: Eduard cockpit

As mentioned the kit ha been started but just a bit.


IMG_20191017_143825149.jpg
IMG_20191017_143843596.jpg
IMG_20191017_143930417.jpg
IMG_20191017_143959969.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nice one John, but you'll need to set up your own thread for your build, this one's Don's :)
 
Reconnaissances was the original use of military aviation!

The ability to look over the next hill and see what your opponent was up to. During the United Sates Civil War, balloons were used to look out and observe and report what troop movements were being done.

The first uses of powered flight by military services were to observe opposing forces. The US used them in the pursuit of Pancho Villa and this was the first uses in WWI, The Great War.

Later came the adaptation of the fighter aircraft to stop the reconnaissances aircraft from getting their information back. This in-turn resulted in reconnaissance aircraft being based on the latest fighter type aircraft with cameras instead of guns.

The McDonnell RF-101A/C was of this design and as an offshoot of a fighter version, it was to far out shadow its original. The F-101A/C was designed to be a long range bomber escort for the Strategic Air Command (SAC) but just as they started making deliveries of the new fighter, SAC deciding it would not work and no longer wanted them, transferred the new fighter to Tactical Air Command (TAC). With a limited production run of only 77 F-101As and 47Cs (the main difference between an A and a C is that the A was stressed to 6.33 Gs and the C was stressed to 7.33 Gs) all assigned to the 81st TFW at Bergstrom AFB, TX as high speed tactical nuclear bombers. Not being much use in Texas, they were transferred to Bentwaters RAFB England and as a whole had a relative short lifespan.

The RF-101A/C on the other had was to have a much more lively career. Starting on 27 November 1957, TAC wanted to show off its new Thoroughbred by putting on a record breaking transcontinental speed run. From Los Angles California, to New York, New York and back again. Than in October 1960 the new reconnaissance bird over flew Cuba in support of the Cuban Missile crisis, bringing back vital photographic information on what was being done about the instillation of nuclear missiles in Cuba. Just one short year later, in October 1961, the RF-101Cs were deployed by the 67th TRS to Vietnam.

THE MODEL

Being the only version of the VooDoo family to see combat, I felt Kitty Hawk would have released it first, but they chose to release the single seat fighter F-101A/C first, and then the critics chimed in, and rightly so. For a kit that cost $80.00 plus there were a lot of mistakes. The intakes were of the version used by the two seat F-101B/F and not any version of the single seater. The Decal sheet had all the buzz numbers wrong in spite of the fact the box artwork was correct? Really? There were many other issues, some correctable some not so much by the modeler.

It took Kitty Hawk near five year to get around to the RF variants and they still got it wrong! All of the original issues and new ones, as they did not change the cockpit instrument panel! The RF version and the single seat fighter version have different IP layouts.

Well having wanted a 1/48th reccee VooDoo for decades and not really wanting to do a conversion, which would have had most all the same issues as the new production kit plus some, I bought two when they came out. I do feel I am rewarding bad behavior but what else can you do.

Print Scale came out with a set of RF-101 VooDoo decals a couple of years before Kitty Hawk announced that they would do a VooDoo line and I had purchased that set as I did have the vacuform conversion set (well two of them) but I couldn't make myself dig into that. Caracal has released two sets for the kit as well. I strongly recommend these sets if you plan on doing one.

The kit does come with two different noses, one for the A/C variants and one for the G/H. The G is an F-101A conversion and the H is a C conversion.


 
Last edited:
I built the 1/72 Hasegawa RF-101C a few years ago. Will be watching this with interest.- John
 
Nice one Don ........ BUT, please edit the thread title to show what the subject is ; it's not currently shown until looking at the kit manufacturer etc.
 
Thank you for fixing my screw up, AGAIN!

Okay, so lets look at the kit in detail, I have two so I used the unstarted kit to show the sprue break down.

The kit is for the most part the F-101A/C kit with different noses and decals as well as clears.

IMG_20191102_101603823.jpg
IMG_20191102_101614189.jpg
IMG_20191102_101825600.jpg
IMG_20191102_102109112.jpg


Changed sprues!

RF-101G/H nose

IMG_20191102_101939749AC.jpg


RF/101A/C nose

IMG_20191102_101939749GH.jpg


RF-101A/C
IMG_20191102_102020714.jpg


RF-101G/H
IMG_20191102_102145595.jpg


Kit markings

IMG_20191102_102525035.jpg
IMG_20191102_102548537.jpg
IMG_20191102_102633802.jpg
IMG_20191102_103009768.jpg
IMG_20191102_103024150.jpg
IMG_20191102_103040752.jpg
IMG_20191102_102951051.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20191102_102249221.jpg
    IMG_20191102_102249221.jpg
    541.8 KB · Views: 152
  • IMG_20191102_102255803.jpg
    IMG_20191102_102255803.jpg
    459.1 KB · Views: 143
  • IMG_20191102_102342405.jpg
    IMG_20191102_102342405.jpg
    578.1 KB · Views: 138
Reference material
IMG_20191102_104831956.jpg

Although Kitty Hawk asked for Detail & Scales help on the kit, they seem to have ignored most of their advice. Below is the RF-101C IP, note the difference with the F-101C below.
IMG_20191102_104845986.jpg
IMG_20191102_104916180.jpg
IMG_20191102_104934106.jpg

I've had this book for about 35 years. I love the color photos of the war time birds.
IMG_20191102_105044517.jpg
IMG_20191102_105052300.jpg
IMG_20191102_105111862.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So now, as they say, On with the show, this is it!

I have already glued the upper and lower wings together and cut the intake to desired length and shape.
IMG_20191103_075034783.jpg
IMG_20191103_075041282.jpg


Here is a comparison of the original intake with the modified intakes

IMG_20191103_075528483.jpg
IMG_20191103_075528483-1.jpg
IMG_20191103_075533817.jpg


The kit does not start with the cockpit but with the intakes and exhaust nozzles.
IMG_20191103_081939943.jpg
IMG_20191103_081953194.jpg

I had already started both,
IMG_20191103_075025900.jpg

So today I've moved on to some painting and PE work. The PE set at first looks to be thick and very heavy. Upon looking closer, it has a heavy clear protective film on both sides. It is very nicely done once (PE wise) once the film is removed. The concept they devised though for the AB can and petals armature, IMHO, leaves a lot to be desired. I do have and very well may use AM resin exhaust cans.
IMG_20191103_081304922.jpg
IMG_20191103_081904857.jpg
IMG_20191103_081928195.jpg
IMG_20191103_085032009.jpg

IMG_20191103_085139735.jpg
IMG_20191103_085145452.jpg


Working up the intakes and painting,
IMG_20191103_075130622.jpg

And I had already glued the nose together. Of point i was not happy with KH lack of interest in filling the nose. Hasegawa put all the cameras in their RF-4B/C in 1/48th as did Tan models 1/48th RF-84 Thunderflash. Comparable priced (or even lower) and I would expect more then being offered. KH has not shown to be All they can be!
IMG_20191103_075100264.jpg
IMG_20191103_075106165.jpg

IMG_20191103_075050037.jpg
 
:thumbright: Good start. If I had my druthers, I would have glued the nose halves to their respective fuselage halve. I've only had to do it twice but I got a better fit and less filling/sanding
As a rule, I agree with you on this, and I can't recall why I did it this way, but I had a reason for doing it. I'm going through on this one but may do the other like you suggest.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back