F4F wildcat Vs. Me 109

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I think its aircraft like the F4F and Hurricane where the energy levels eclipsed the wing loadings and turning abilities of the biplane, this it was left behind, but you're hitting the nail on the head.

As mentioned earlier, despite it's drawbacks, the F4F only suffered about 190 air-to-air losses while claiming over 900 aircraft (I'm estimating), but as you stated mainly because of pilot's skill.
 
Not to be overly picky, but it is the F4F, not the F-4F and F6F, not the F-6F. Further, the Navy did not "go scurring for a better plane". The design work on the F4U started in 1938 and for the F6F in 1940. And before someone brings it up, no, the A6M recovered from the Aleutians had absolutely nothing to do with the development of the F6F.

Rich

Rich
 

Absolutely correct, I fully agree.
 

I know it did not have anything to do with the development but didn't it have something to do with some minor changes that were made late in the development stage.
 
Thought I had posted this but I guess I forgot to push the submit button.

Not to be overly picky, but it is the F4F, not the F-4F

Sorry about the nomenclature error. I should know better. I guess old age is catching me. I remember, as a kid growing up in Pensacola, watching the Blue Angels practice from our back yard. The first planes I remember them having were F9F Cougars! I also remember seeing Navy blimps and yellow SNJs flying overhead.

The F4F with its Navy and Marine pilots have earned the rabid support it has received on these pages.
 

Very cool! I remember the Angels when they had F11s - shows my age!
 

Users who are viewing this thread