Why was it better? Just because it didn't have a Ranger engine? Did that one have a W670 Continental? Other than the engine and cockpit details the airframes were pretty much the same weren't they?the PT-23 was better than the PT-19 & PT-26
In 1967, as a junior in college, I was offered a low time PT26 with a fresh 200 HP Ranger for $1500. (A full year's tuition at the time) My tuition was already paid, and I was broke, so I had to pass on that. A year later I heard that the guy who did buy it took it in for an annual and discovered the main spar was rotted out and the glue was delaminating. Repairing that ran up a $5500 dollar bill, and when I left for the Navy three years later the plane was still sitting out in the weather waiting for him to scrape up the cash. When he finally got it out of hock, it of course, had to be annualed again, and the Ranger wouldn't pass compression test due to rusted cylinders. The plane eventually burned up in a fire "of mysterious origin" out in front of the maintenance shop one night.