Groundhog Thread Part Deux - P-39 Fantasy and Fetish - The Never Ending Story (Mods take no responsibility for head against wall injuries sustained) (3 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Although a handful of P-39s from the 36th FS went up to Moresby in early April, 1942, they really didn't see much action until the whole squadron and their supporting ground crews got there near the end of the month. First kills credited 30 April 1942. Yoshino was the victim of the first withdrawal escort mission flown in the SWPA. Up to that time the B-26s of the 22nd BG and the B-25s of the 3rd BG were flying unescorted. The 3rd BG had been mauled by Zeroes in back to back missions in late May, losing eight B-25s in two missions. So the Tainan pilots were conditioned to having their way with the unescorted bombers especially when they had to climb to get back over the Owen Stanleys. The 9 June mission was the first time friendly fighters were on hand to scrape the pursuers off so the bombers could get over the mountains unmolested.
 
Sounds good to me.
 
Sidebar: Just received a review copy of the latest in the Osprey "Duel" series: P-39/400 v. A6M2. Amazingly enough, the Bells broke even at 15-15 in New Guinea though of course they claimed 5-6 times as many.
 
Yes, the Osprey P-39 Aces book says much the same thing.

Of course Guadalcanal was the big problem. They were at even more of a disadvantage there and I think the P-400 reliability suffered from being shipped over the ETO and then down to the Solomans, as well as being equipped with RAF oxygen systems that the USAAF system could not support.

Interesting item in the P-39 Aces book. Buzz Wagner led a force of P-39's up the coast of New Guinea to attack Japanese seaplane bases and got into a huge furball of a fight in which both sides lost equal numbers. But that was a few days before the Battle of the Coral Sea, and one of the IJN's problems was inadequate recon seaplane support to their fleet. The IJN HQ tasked their seaplane units in the area and they replied that they were not in a position to help. Whether planned to help the naval engagement or not, the P-39's shot up those seaplane bases at just the right time.
 
P-39s never even came close to shooting down 15 Zekes over Moresby. Try a maximum of 7, but probably closer to 5,

Ratios for overall P-39/A6M losses are better. All up losses are around 30 for the Zekes to about 60 for the P-39s, though some sources say many more.

.
 
How do you figure?
 
P-39 Expert said:
Who knows how accurate their records are?
Click to expand...

Why are Japanese records always called into question? As Wes said, they had their own maintenance and administrative needs, what's to be gained by lying? I doubt any staff officer wanted to get caught telling his boss they had plenty of XYZ aircraft left when the reality was only half or less. Seppuku comes to mind if the general found out.
 
Hey, I just noticed I've been promoted to Airman 1st Class. What a non-sequitur! Airman is an E-3; Petty Officer 1st Class is an E-6. Does that make me an E-9? Or an E-4 1/2? Now if you want to do the sensible thing, and rate me AP (Airplane Pilot) 1st Class, that would be eagerly accepted! (My apologies to all the ancient members of that long abolished rate who are rolling over in their graves at this travesty.) I await with trembling heart my fate.
Cheers,
Wes
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)

Similar threads

Paper comparing the flight performance of the P-40E Warhawk and the A6M2 Zero
Replies
8
Views
717
Ivan1GFP
I
The poor performance of the 343 Kokutai against USAAF fighters
2 3 4
Replies
60
Views
6K
GrauGeist
617th squadron and the bunkers in Ijmuiden.
2
Replies
23
Views
652
DerAdlerIstGelandet
M
P-39 Turbo - Here We Go Again
Replies
13
Views
2K
GregP
P-39-style fighter by other people?
2 3
Replies
50
Views
2K
GrauGeist
Menu
Log in
Register