Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
As it is, I believe the Natter killed more German test pilots than Allied casualties inflicted.
Look how the Luftwaffe forced the 8th AF and RAF BC to rethink their strategies earlier in the war.You need enough to push the loss rate of the bombers up to about 5% per mission. That might not sound much but no air force can survive an on going attrition rate at that level. On a 1,000 bomber raid not only does that represent 50 expensive bombers but also the loss of 500 expensively trained airmen.
For comparison Bomber Command losses throughout the war vary around 2%-3% for its heavy bombers and that still means that a bomber crew was taking roughly a 50/50 chance on their lives to complete a tour.
In some historical 'what ifs', not something I like to indulge in, inflicting a 5% loss rate on the USAAF by day would seem to have been within the capability of a Luftwaffe operating a couple of hundred Me 262s.
Cheers
Steve
The Me262's rate of closure meant that it only had a second or so to effectively fire on it's target as it hurtled in on the bomber formation.Would having a dive break installed made a bigger difference in their ability to inflict losses, as Eric Brown suggested?
I still feel that the Allied fighter incursions would have still happened.
If the Allies ran a combination GA with Top Cover style mission, I am sure the Luftwaffe would have challenged them. Although trying to conduct GA missions near Luftwaffe airbases had the additional thrill of heavy AA protection.But they wouldn't have found the Luftwaffe. The fighters came up to intercept the bombers. The RAF tried baiting them up earlier in the war and it didn't work.
Nicely done!I can imagine the 8th AF switching to night bombing, but that wouldn't happen over night (no pun intended).
The Me262's rate of closure meant that it only had a second or so to effectively fire on it's target as it hurtled in on the bomber formation.
Easing off the throttled did not slow the aircraft enough to allow an extended firing window. It was suggested that if the Me262 had "dive brakes" installed, it would have allowed the Me262 to come into the formation at speed and suddenly deaccelerate, enabling it to have a longer firing window (where the pilot could align the cannon on target), which would also increase accuracy.