Sep 27, 2006 Thread starter #21 Chief Senior Airman 352 0 Jul 12, 2006 Actually, I think that if they do deside to do this. Ray would probably be the better choice as terms as the first one. First it's amphibious, size doesn't really matter underwater. Still just a thought.
Actually, I think that if they do deside to do this. Ray would probably be the better choice as terms as the first one. First it's amphibious, size doesn't really matter underwater. Still just a thought.
Sep 28, 2006 #22 k9kiwi Staff Sergeant 839 25 Jul 2, 2006 Kiwi Land And back to reality with a soggy thud. The advantage of tanks using treads is Low Ground Pressure. Ask the poor sods who have to take an LAV off road if it will go the same places as an M113. Now replace treads or wheels with hoofing big feet and you got a wee problem there Jim Bob. "As soons as I get my feets outa this here swamp, I's gunna blow yer head off, ya hear."
And back to reality with a soggy thud. The advantage of tanks using treads is Low Ground Pressure. Ask the poor sods who have to take an LAV off road if it will go the same places as an M113. Now replace treads or wheels with hoofing big feet and you got a wee problem there Jim Bob. "As soons as I get my feets outa this here swamp, I's gunna blow yer head off, ya hear."