Most Overrated aircraft of WWII.....?

The most over-rated aircraft of WW2


  • Total voters
    409

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

All A6M's, capable of flying long distances??? Ever looked at the map and distances of the Pacific?
I had looked at a map, may father even served in the Pacific, it was still a surprise when I took a flight from Tokyo to Singapore and the nice lady at the front said the flight would take 6hrs 20 minutes, even bigger surprise in Singapore when I got on a ferry to Malaysia and I could see it before we set off.
 
didn't the f4u and f6f make their combat debut in 1943

They certainly did.
I was refering to you comment 'also n 1943 the allies had better planes not 1944' - that was not the case, due to Allies having better planes than Germany, let alone the Japanese in 1944 (and in 1943).
 
the f4u and f6f were in 1943
F6F first flight: 1942
F6F accepted by USN: 1943
F6F first PTO combat: 1 September 1943 downing an H8K flying boat.
F6F first engagement versus A6M: 23 November 1943.

F4U first flight: 1940
F4U accepted by USN: December 1942
F4U first PTO combat:
February 1943 (12 aircraft, USMC land-based)
November 1943 (VF-17 USN land-based)

The F4U was not in the PTO with any significant numbers until 1944.
 
Apart from the fact you didn't understand what I was asking. You're counting 1500 japanese aircraft, so I ask how many of these could fight overseas?
I might be wrong but couldn't the zeros reach the Philippines from japan? so yes they can fight overseas?

They certainly did.
I was refering to you comment 'also n 1943 the allies had better planes not 1944' - that was not the case, due to Allies having better planes than Germany, let alone the Japanese in 1944 (and in 1943).
wasn't this debate about the pacific? what I meant to say as that the Americans had better planes in not just in 1944
 
I might be wrong but couldn't the zeros reach the Philippines from japan? so yes they can fight overseas?


wasn't this debate about the pacific? what I meant to say as that the Americans had better planes in not just in 1944

The Japanese aircraft that attacked the Philippines flew from Formosa (Taiwan), not from Japan). they didn't have THAT much range.......
 
As I previously stated, the F6F first engaged Japanese fighters in November 1943.

Japanese-held Wake Island did not have fighters stationed there.

As far as Lexington goes, she had just come out of shake-down and still had F4Fs (soon to be replaced), but double checking, the Cowpens and Enterprise did have F6Fs aboard.
That being said, there was no aerial opposition during the October 1943 Wake assault - it was naval shelling and ground attack operations.
 
252 Kokutai launched 23 Zeros to intercept the raid, claiming 14, but losing 16 pilots, a further six Zeros escorting seven G4M to reinforce the atoll were bounced by F6Fs. losing three, but the bombers turned back and escaped.

Source: Japanese Naval Fighter Aces, Hata, Izawa, Shores
 
I'm willing to bet that we each overrate aircraft others underrate, and underrate aircraft others overrate.

I think the only ratings that matter are from the pilots who either flew the plane, or flew against it.

I know what airplanes I like, but I'm not even a pilot, so my opinion is worth every penny you've paid for it.
totally agree.

i think i have said before that in any most underrated, overrated, best or worst polls of WW2 aircraft the P-51, Spitfire and Bf 109 seem to always be near the top in all !
and usually they end in arguments based on nationalistic chest thumping :lol:
 
the f4u and f6f were in 1943

The P-38 and F4Us were in squadron strength in Mid 43 (June and Aug), F6F in Aug (land based)- limited area of operations. The mainstay for AAF and USN/USMC were P-39/P-40/F4F through 1943. Actual combat in P-38 and F4U was earlier but not in force level to be significant.
i know that about the a6m like I'm not that dumb

You probably should reflect that it was far better suited as an air superiority fighter for naval operations than the Spitfire, Bf 109, Fw 190, F4F, P-39, P-40, Yak3, Yak9, P47 - had those aircraft been acceptably modified for carrier ops and then introduced into combat. Low to medium altitude escort and sweeps (with range) are where the A6M lived.

That it was gradually outclassed, was a factor of two performance attributes it faced vs US. Speed and zoom climb. To a degree it also suffered from lack of armor and self sealing tanks for survivability - that said they (correctly) designed for maneuverability and agility to gain advantage at 4 to six o'clock rather than be clobbered when flying 'unaware'. Most air combat was decided by the aircraft that got into firing position behind the victim.

The IJN also suffered from tactics deficiency in that to them, combat was an individual obligation - not a team effort - so the concept of two ship and four ship mutual protection in attack was first exploited by Thatch and then all Allied tactics copied from LW as Finger Four formations.
 
Last edited:
totally agree.

i think i have said before that in any most underrated, overrated, best or worst polls of WW2 aircraft the P-51, Spitfire and Bf 109 seem to always be near the top in all !
and usually they end in arguments based on nationalistic chest thumping :lol:
You know Karl, the Spitfire is both the best and the worst aircraft of WW2 and everything in between :lol:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back