Oshkosh 2022

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Couple more

DSC_0014.JPG


The Mustang below is a reduced in size one to one drawing built at 70 percent from the original size drawing. Every thing was hand made all way down to the individual rivets. Plane was built in Germany. Flown by transport to US and reassembles here in Wisconsin for the Airshow.

DSC_0039.JPGDSC_0899.JPG
 
Glider said:
You mentioned a new lens. May I ask what lens as it's doing an excellent job
Click to expand...

Afternoon Glider, Most of the shots in the air I am taking with a Sigma 150-600mm lens for a Nikon 3200D camera. I now have 4 different lens that will work on the base but the Sigma is my newest one. In years past I used a Nikon DX 55-300mm lens but I also have a Nikon DX 55-200mm lens. My son now uses the 55-300mm lens on a D3400 base. Of which both are actually my camera's but I let him use one

Here is the Sigma lens installed.

 
Last edited:
Crimea_River said:
Let us know the verdict on that lens for flying shots. I'm limited to 300mm right now and find that it's not enough for many shots.
Click to expand...
Will do, so far I like it but its heavy, about 4.5 lbs. So far I have not found a really good setting for prop blur. My normal settings has to be perfectly still otherwise the picture blurs which I was using around 300. Top one was at around 500 for shutter speed. Bottom one was at 1500 shutter speed. You have to be perfectly still to get good prop blur at 500 for that setting which in wind and moving aircraft almost impossible. Some times I can get some to start like bottom one but most of time it looks like propeller stationary and plane suspended in air. Clarity wise though the higher speed looks tons better. Currently my camera is setup to take picture of about 7 meg per shot though I reduce that for message board. I could double if not triple the file sizer per shot but so far have not mess with it. I use a 32 gig sim card so I could if I wanted to go bigger.

 
Last edited:
Yeah I read about that rig being heavy. Was looking into it a couple of years back. I find that good prop blurs have have a setting of 1/250 or slower but camera shake is a real issue there. This was taken last Saturday at 1/250 on my Canon 70-300 zoom with Image Stabilization:

 
Last edited:
Thank you, the results speak for themselves.
 

Great shot, yeah there seems to be a trade off that's for sure. The negative part of this lens is minimum of 150. Which is why I am glad I have two camera's though like I said my son using my second one right now. So switching lens can be a pain. The good news though was when I bought the lens it was on sale for 25% off so I am not going to complain to much as I love the clarity. Just have to deal with the trade off for now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

Cell phone Oshkosh shots.
Replies
4
Views
643
Gnomey
Oshkosh 2023
Replies
18
Views
2K
N4521U
Oshkosh 2023 Photo Phile
25 26 27
Replies
533
Views
29K
Gnomey
Jeff's Oshkosh 2022 JPEGs.
21 22 23
Replies
449
Views
22K
Gnomey
Old Buckenham 2022
4 5 6
Replies
103
Views
6K
rochie