the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
the lancaster kicks ass said:so i think people are wrong when they say that without fighter command we'd give up, we might not win, but we would fight to the last man......
the lancaster kicks ass said:so i think people are wrong when they say that without fighter command we'd give up, we might not win, but we would fight to the last man......
Couldn't agree more Lanc, well said.the lancaster kicks ass said:Soren, are you british?? it doesn't sound it, when was the last time we gave up hope?? in 1940 what did the luftwaffe have that could take out a capital ship?? the LW were no more prepared to take out ships than the RAF, we were both still using small bombs to try and penetrate the top armour, which wasn't gonna happen, you're right in saying that aircraft are the most effective weapons against ships, but only really when they're carrying torpedos, the RN would have loved the chance to bring their huge forces together for the sole purpose of destroying the ill prepared invasin force, the germans had no experience of amphibious landings and were coming over often in just civilian barges! they wouldn't have a chance, the germans caused problems releasing S-boats into the allied invasion force and they just had a couple of torp. tubes, imagine what battleships and cruisers would do, meanwhile the massed flak from all the ships the the german fear or hitting their own ships in the channel would make it very difficult for them to bomb, i realise there would be losses but they can be replaced as long as the island remains intact, if you think we'd have given up you know nothing about the British........
DerAdlerIstGelandet said:I give up. Whats the point in trying to get a thread back on topic when no one listens anyhow?