DonL
Banned
Please post that chart of the PzGr. 1940.
The transport from Narvic was still intact. Sorry my sources tells Knaben was dead. Why were the problems with molybdänerz relevant for the german steel economy at 1944? There are more hints that the steel was bridle and many many projects suffered from enough molybdänerz.
I didn't told that Udet killed the Ju 89 program, i told he wanted the He 177 to divebomb and that's a matter of fact! It was an order from Udet himself!
And yes Wever started the Bomber A. But that's not an argument that the Ju 89 was a total failure. The bird was in the category of the B17, more engine power is all you need. That are the same arguments against the FW 187, because all compare this bird with Jumo 210 engines, what is absurd.
I don't want to be rude as well, but I think I have my arguments documented by many sources, and realy, I don't think I'm naive and basing my arguments on cliches!
The problem with Knaben as for ALL other mines was transportation from the mines.
The transport from Narvic was still intact. Sorry my sources tells Knaben was dead. Why were the problems with molybdänerz relevant for the german steel economy at 1944? There are more hints that the steel was bridle and many many projects suffered from enough molybdänerz.
Ok next, the Ju 89 was called the Ural bomber for a reason. Could it get there? No, it had a limited range. Fine, who killed the program? Udet? No, my friend, it was Wever himself who started the Bomber A program which lead to the He 177.
I didn't told that Udet killed the Ju 89 program, i told he wanted the He 177 to divebomb and that's a matter of fact! It was an order from Udet himself!
And yes Wever started the Bomber A. But that's not an argument that the Ju 89 was a total failure. The bird was in the category of the B17, more engine power is all you need. That are the same arguments against the FW 187, because all compare this bird with Jumo 210 engines, what is absurd.
It is not that our opinions are miles apart, yours is simply based on outdated and cliche information. Don't mean to be rude here. I am just saying that I used to share your opinion but I have gradually moved away from it and have become a bit more critical to the standard cliches I usually read.
I don't want to be rude as well, but I think I have my arguments documented by many sources, and realy, I don't think I'm naive and basing my arguments on cliches!