Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
'Cos Russian combat aircraft need 2 engines so that, if one engine fails, the second can carry the aircraft to the scene of the crash?
Sorry...couldn't resist. In reality, I think Russian engines are improving, reliability-wise, compared to where they once were.
Most first generation jets had two engines because of low thrust-to-weight and reliability issues.The russians were extremely succesful in the Cold war with the single engine MIG 21 and lesser degree with the Mig 23 , also in the export market. Considering the high price of the F35 probably they could sell some single engine competitor cheaper than the Mig-35, Su-30, Su-35 family. For most countries the new generation twin engine fighter is too costly to maintain.
What dispute was that?Whatever happened to the royalty dispute that was between Yak and the F35 programme on the vectoring thrust nozzle? Just interested
The main component of the F-35B's V/STOL ability is a engine powered lift fan. If you compare the thrust vectoring nozzle of both aircraft, they are very different in design.On the thrust vectoring nozzle design. The Yak 141 had the system in 1989 and is almost identical to the F35, I have some pics somewhere.
Depends what you are doing and if it has a patient.Using wedge-shaped pieces of duct to alter angles is hardly an original concept, even in the 1980's.