some F35 info

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

GreenKnight121 said:
You clearly stated that there are two European projects to replace the F-35.



See the part I bolded?

Or are you trying to say there are two OTHER European fighter projects ongoing and that it is those that will replace the F-35?
Click to expand...
For a number of European nations that currently use or plan to use the F35, one of the two 6th Generation aircraft projects being developed in Europe will almost certainly eventually replace the F35. In the same way they only used the F16 and replaced them with the F35. Others will no doubt use the two tier approach.

However I notice that you haven't disagreed with the main point of my posting which was: -

However the original point still stands. The USA no longer has a stranglehold on the ability to design and develop highly advanced military aircraft. If its not careful, it will have to fund the development and build on its own. The rest of the world have options, good options.
 
The U.S. is in the process of developing a 6th gen fighter by way of the F/A-XX/NGAD program (USN/USAF respectively).

This programs are to replace the F/A-18 and F-22, which currently augment the F-35 nd don't appear to have planned export options.

In foreign militaries, their F-35 is augmented by their fighter of choice when needed.
 
Just clickbait headlines, I think.
  • No canceled order because there was no order in the first place
  • Choice of fighter hasn't even been made yet -- IE: no FMS request/approval yet
  • As far as we (public) know, the F-35 is still in the running
 
You could be correct but Canada is now being reported to be looking for alternatives to the majority of the F35 order. They have paid for the first batch but are looking for alternatives to the rest because they don't consider the USA to be a trustworthy supplier.

If I remember correctly the Gripen was a close contender in the first selection process and has to be a serious option.
 
Last edited:
Glider said:
You could be correct but Canada is now being reported to be looking for alternatives to the majority of the F3 order. They have paid for the first batch but are looking for alternatives to the rest because they don't consider the USA to be a trustworthy supplier.

If I remember correctly the Gripen was a close contender in the first selection process and has to be a serious option.
Click to expand...

The other fighters didn't meet the RCAF's requirements, I'm still thinking 'political theatre'.

To me, any significant change seems unlikely (7:05 - 12:25).


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbNzrQQUxqI
 
Last edited:
May we suggest:

mp-typhoon-canden-dorschner-lg.jpg
 
As noted elsewhere, the first Canadian F-35 Squadron (let alone the entire fleet) isn't expected to be operational until 2029. For some strange reason -- which may or may not involve the phrase 'Term Limits', I expect the current level of chaos to be drastically reduced by then.

I'd rather see the RCAF get the aircraft they selected as meeting their requirements vs. an inadequate option for the sake of politics.

As stated in the video I posted here a couple of months ago -- Professor Justin Bronk:
... the only other thing to to ask ... even if one doesn't want to go into all the technical side of things is okay; ... why has almost every country that has been allowed to look at it 'behind the black curtain' so to speak--so been allowed to look into some of the more classified capabilities and compare them to other aircraft on the market--why have almost every single one that's been allowed to look gone for the F-35? Because not just political alignment with America. In some cases that was the key thing, but a lot of cases (and I've seen some of the metrics on some of those competitions) there's a very very good reason why countries that require an ability to operate in contested airspace--if they have the option--almost exclusively buy the F-35, and have done for 10 years.

And he recently wrote on twitter re: the current drama:

On F-35 fears, I get it - there is real dependency.

But if all your targeting capacity, beyond line-of-sight comms, penetrating/orbital ISR, and the munitions you assume you'd fight with in a war are US-provided; then dependency on the US for Mission Data Files and Autonomic Logistics Information System/Operational Data Integrated Network for F-35 isn't your main problem.
 
Last edited:
GreenKnight121 said:
Except for the inconvenient fact that both projects are for a TYPHOON replacement*, not an F-35 replacement!

*Except for the Japanese part of GCAP - which is to replace the Mitsubishi F-2 in the JASDF, and the French portion of FCAS - which is to replace the remaining Mirage 2000s and supplement or replace Rafale in the AdlAdlE.
Click to expand...
Looks like Britain may invite Canada to the GCAP project.

ukdefencejournal.org.uk

UK open to Canadian involvement in new fighter jet project

The UK government has signalled its openness to future collaboration with Canada on the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP), the international effort to develop a next-generation fighter jet by 2035.
ukdefencejournal.org.uk ukdefencejournal.org.uk

This would presumably be a late 2040s successor for Canada's incoming mixed force of F-35s and Rafales/Gripens/Typhoons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

Venomstick121
Gulf of Sidra 1981 Info wanted
Replies
7
Views
2K
Barrett
B
F
Allison J33 -A-24 Info
Replies
1
Views
2K
mjfur
M
WARSPITER
SR-72 Darkstar info
Replies
8
Views
2K
SaparotRob
SaparotRob
M
Some Interesting Vietnam Shots
Replies
5
Views
2K
Gnomey
Gnomey
Dronescapes
Experimental Flight Test Center at Edwards Air Force Base. Some rare, unclassified footage
Replies
2
Views
1K
Thumpalumpacus
Thumpalumpacus
Back