T-38 days

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

davparlr

Senior Master Sergeant
3,297
658
Mar 23, 2006
Southern California
I have written before about being jerked back into the past every time I visit my wife's home town of Enid and watch the AF training planes fly. I am especially moved by the smell of burned kerosene wafting in the wind and going down the road that parallels the outside runway at Vance AFB and watch the T-38s do touch-and-gos. I got a new camera and thought I would take some pixs. Here is a few of them (not all are of the same aircraft), a couple of pix on final where the T-38 is going about 180-190 mph (190-200 mph no-flap), flair, solo pilot, touchdown, in front of mobile control, where instructors watch, airspeed is 150-160 mph with flaps, and one pix of after touch-and-go for a no-flap, note the high angle of attack. I don't remember using the after burner on touch-and-gos but the open nozzle is a dead giveaway for its operation.

Oh, how my heart yearns to go climb into the cockpit and drill holes in the sky in one. There is a chance that the fathers of these student pilots were not even born when I was flying these very same planes, forty-three years ago.
 

Attachments

  • T-38 approach (640x480).jpg
    33.1 KB · Views: 133
  • T-38 short approach (640x480).jpg
    46.9 KB · Views: 137
  • T-38Flair(640x480).jpg
    59.7 KB · Views: 129
  • T-38 touchdown (640x480).jpg
    57.8 KB · Views: 137
  • T-38 On_the_go(640x480).jpg
    62.1 KB · Views: 132
vikingBerserker said:
I always though that, the F-5 and F-20 were just beautiful aircraft. I envy you having flown in one.
Click to expand...

While I went on to fly the great and powerful C-141 on adventures around the world, it is still a big source of pride to have flown the T-38. I benefited from the AF policy at the time that all pilots must be qualified to fly all aircraft in the inventory except helicopters so we all had the same training. Today the AF pilots are divided into fighters and multi-engined aircraft prior to the T-38 so only fighter trainees get to fly the T-38. Too bad. The T-38s have been operational since 1961 almost half the time that airplanes have been flying and is still an outstanding aircraft. It will be sad day when it is retired and will probably be replaced with a less performing aircraft (except maybe in fuel consumption).
 
The T-38 is a real nice looking aircraft. Dave, thumbs up to you and your flying career, my friend; you freight haulers invented the meaning of "Globalization" before the word was invented.
 
I have read some stuff about the T-38 about that it had to be careful as ice could damage the engines and that it was very wobbly in the stall with little warning.

It would be very interested to hear what a pilot actual thinks of it.
 
Matt308 said:
Dav, how was the landing characteristics for the T-38? Looks like it would be pretty hot on final.
Click to expand...

Speed on final is 155 kts + fuel (10kts per 1000lb, iirc). Aircraft was very predictable with no quirks. However, because of little wings, you learned to fly with power, low on glide slope, add power, high pull power off. DO NOT GET BEHIND THE POWER CURB. Afterburners gave it a nice punch when you needed it. I did not find it difficult to land.


nuuumannn said:
The T-38 is a real nice looking aircraft. Dave, thumbs up to you and your flying career, my friend; you freight haulers invented the meaning of "Globalization" before the word was invented.
Click to expand...
Yep, saw a lot of foreign runways! Never made to New Zealand though. Had some friends who did get there flying operation deep freeze to Antarctica.


The Basket said:
I have read some stuff about the T-38 about that it had to be careful as ice could damage the engines and that it was very wobbly in the stall with little warning.

It would be very interested to hear what a pilot actual thinks of it.
Click to expand...
The T-38 did not like ice. We were forbidden to fly through 2 ft. of icing conditions, although I never figured out how one knew that. The T-37, on the other hand, with it centrifugal compressor didn't care about any thing. I think it would fly through a waterfall with no problems! I never experienced a problem with stalls. It may had wobbled a bit but general fell through gently, with no yaw, typical of jet operations. Spins were forbidden and could not be recovered from but very difficult to get into. I love the plane. It was fast and was precise in maneuvering (had to in order to be a Thunderbird aircraft), and wouldn't bite you if you kept to the basics and above all, kept your speed up.

Its just a cool, fast (supersonic) aircraft that I am proud to have had opportunity to fly.
 
T'is a pity that a similar r-evolution of the design won't likely be carried on with for future trainer projects... newer brass + older reliable system = replace with less for more in all Bss Aackward ways.
 
I remember reading the icing bit and though it odd as the F-5 was flown by some very cold countries!
 
Great pics and interesting info. I almost got the chance to have a ride in one, when the 'Aggressors' were at Alconbury with F-5s, back in the early 1980's. Never happened though, as the day I was supposed to go, I was busy with an exhibition. I've never forgiven the guy who went 'sick', leaving me to take his place!!
 
Book was Gen Michael Collins of Apollo 11 fame.

Shows how old the T-38 is!

The BAe Hawk would be the obvious replacement as the navy already use it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

M
T-28 Crashes at Airshow In Hungary
Replies
1
Views
670
Steve Hnz
S
What's going to happen to the T-38?
2 3
Replies
45
Views
4K
GrauGeist
M
USN Buys T-54's
Replies
0
Views
490
MIflyer
M
M
T-7A Rollout
Replies
15
Views
1K
DerAdlerIstGelandet
M
T-45C Crash in Sept 2021
Replies
1
Views
567
cvairwerks
C
Menu
Log in
Register