CobberKane
Banned
- 706
- Apr 4, 2012
Recently the there was a bit of a discussion on the bias (or otherwise) of everyone's favourite test pilot, Eric Brown. In support of the pro-bias camp, Browns conclusion that the Swordfish was a better torpedo bomber than the Avenger in the Atlantic was cited. Sounds silly, but I did a bit of reading and found some opinions that the old string bag could take off in much worse weather than the Avenger, from much smaller carriers, and due to the British use of radar could attack in crappy weather or even at night, where its vulnerability to fighters was mitigated.
All of which makes me think of other aircraft, superseded in performance, that continued to be built and make their mark due to cost effectiveness, unexpected capabilities or any other circumstances, when the expectation had been that they should have been yesterday's news. Swordfish, Wildcat, Hurricane - let's take a look at the aircraft that circumstance kept in the field long aft they might have been cancelled orders and scrap iron.
All of which makes me think of other aircraft, superseded in performance, that continued to be built and make their mark due to cost effectiveness, unexpected capabilities or any other circumstances, when the expectation had been that they should have been yesterday's news. Swordfish, Wildcat, Hurricane - let's take a look at the aircraft that circumstance kept in the field long aft they might have been cancelled orders and scrap iron.