What other aircraft could have been used, other than the B-25?
View attachment 638514
View attachment 638515
"De Havilland Mosquito"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
What other aircraft could have been used, other than the B-25?
View attachment 638514
View attachment 638515
Was it available then?"De Havilland Mosquito"
Actually, IMO it "would have" been perfect if it had the TO performance (which it probably did)"De Havilland Mosquito"
NONE!This raid troubles me because it seems we spent a lot in lives and material for one raid compared to how little the Flying Tigers got for seven months of service in China. PR moves are PR moves. I also wonder just how much the 'Tigers influenced Japan's decision to attack Pearl Harbor.
My comment was made purely in jest, but, yes, the Mosquito B.IV had entered service by April 1942. Obviously there was no realistic way that Mosquitoes would have been used, let alone considered by the US authorities (unless, like the Lancaster as an atom bomber some vague reference was made in some obscure paper that has yet to be revealed). Performance wise the Mossie quite probably could have done it, but again, we are treading on soft ground regarding the use of the type by the Americans before the British get them.Was it available then?
My comment was made purely in jest, but, yes, the Mosquito B.IV had entered service by April 1942. Obviously there was no realistic way that Mosquitoes would have been used, let alone considered by the US authorities (unless, like the Lancaster as an atom bomber some vague reference was made in some obscure paper that has yet to be revealed). Performance wise the Mossie quite probably could have done it, but again, we are treading on soft ground regarding the use of the type by the Americans before the British get them.
*IF* you had read upthread, you would have learned this raid was strategic and had nothing, zero, to do with "PR".This raid troubles me because it seems we spent a lot in lives and material for one raid compared to how little the Flying Tigers got for seven months of service in China. PR moves are PR moves. I also wonder just how much the 'Tigers influenced Japan's decision to attack Pearl Harbor.
Yes, I beleive two were equipped with cameras and were situated either midway or tail end of the flight.Certainly there were not many Mosquito B.IVs at that time, and they would have been the series i, of which only 10 were made. The B.IV series ii would only become operational the following month.
May have been able to get a PR.I on loan for the mission, to take-off after the B-25s, photograph the target areas and possibly return to the carrier. It may have needed modification to have a hook to do the last part.
Would getting photographs of the home islands have been worth the effort?
Two of the B-25s carried cameras. How long before US intelligence had the photographs?
Calling it a "PR" stunt is a slap in the face of every single crewmember of the 16 B-25s and the men who made it possible
The bombers were supposed to fly on to China where they would be incorporated into the China Air Task Force which would become Chennault's 14th Air Force. They were forced to launch early when the approach to Japan was detected by Japanese picket boats, so could not reach the Chinese bases that had been set up for their arrival.
I am a little surprised that we did not use the Doolittle Raid idea elsewhere. Just think, if we had, say, some cargo ships or oilers fitted with flight decks, sort of predecessors to the baby flat tops, put one or two B-25's or A-20's on board, and at Midway or some of the other battles, launched them and had them make low approaches to the enemy fleet from a different direction to the carrier aircraft, then recover on land. That could have shook things up a bit.
Clever idea for sure, but has more cracks in it than a dry lake in drought season.I know someone would find fault but I think it's a clever idea. USN Cam ships. Cool.
Roger that on all points.Clever idea for sure, but has more cracks in it than a dry lake in drought season.
1) After Coral Sea and with the Japanese Midway build up on the horizon, but objective uncertain, you'd never get USN to go along with such a scheme. The limited speed and agility of an embryo jeep carrier would be a drag on the fast carrier task forces, or, if independent, divert already limited escort resources. The alternative would be to send them in unprotected as sacrificial lambs. USN would fight that tooth and nail.
2) You're going to send crews and aircraft into harm's way to make DUMMY RUNS??
3) Or, are you going to expect Army aviators to become torpedo delivery experts on short notice? Remember, those Marauders at Midway were a last ditch innovation in defiance of all doctrine.
4) Retrospectroscope says Midway turned out to be such a chaotic scene that the added confusion of a couple more multi engine bombers would likely fall in the "diminishing returns" category.
5) The ONLY scenario that guarantees any greater benefit than actual history would be if somebody managed to get a first strike hit on Hiryu. What are the chances that a couple more Army bombers would accomplish that when an entire Navy torpedo squadron couldn't? Remember Hiryu was under a localized overcast and hidden from everybody except the scud running Devastators and Zeros that were fighting over her.
Roger that. Concur.Growing old is mandatory. Growing up is optional.