The English greatest weapon....

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

history of law English Common Law

http://labspace.open.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=415819

These make an interesting read.

In 1154, Henry II institutionalised common law by creating a unified court system 'common' to the country through incorporating and elevating local custom to the national level, ending local control, eliminating arbitrary remedies, and reinstating a jury system of citizens sworn on oath to investigate criminal accusations and civil claims. Judges of the realm went on regular journeys throughout the country bringing the King's justice to every citizen. Their aim was that there should be a common system of law throughout the land, hence the laws became known as the common law. The travelling judges formed a nucleus of judges with national jurisdiction who had no local roots. They were thus much less susceptible to the corruption which had spoilt a similar attempt earlier in the twelfth century in which the royal judges had actually been based in the local communities. It was under Henry II that judges were for the first time sent on 'circuits', hearing pleas in the major places they visited and taking over the work of the local courts. In time the decisions of the judges were written down. As the decisions of these courts came to be recorded and published, so the practice developed where past decisions (precedents) would be cited in argument before the courts and would be regarded as being of persuasive authority.

These practices developed into the common law of England.

Muslim laws? Not on your nelly.
Cheers
John
 
You don't say "Cherrio" and "Spiffing"?
Dang it! Now I have no interest in seeing England.
(You do say "Pip-pip!" though, right?)

Haha Meat, in 2013 you are more lucky to hear the F word than 'top hole old bean'
The clipped brisk English accent in wartime and post war Pathe / BBC news is a joy to behold....( not)
Cheers
John
 
I am sure the good folk of Much Wenlock (the birthplace of the Olympic Games of modern times) spoke but little French.

Odd lot in central Shropshire John.:shock:

"The old woman's" race for a pound of tea may yet be re-introduced".....one for the Boston Americans? :lol:
 
English Common Law is a curiosity in that it does not match Anglo-Saxon Law nor French Law. There is a theory that the Normans needed a law of their own in England as Anglo-Saxon Law did not suit them. Fellow Normans had taken over Sicily from the Muslims and taken on the existing law there which was a Maghrebi Maliki (North African) form of Muslim Law. Juries and so forth.

In essence the idea is that the English Normans told their Sicilian Norman friends that they could do with a new complete set of laws and the Sicilian Normans wrote back 'here's one we found and use, try it (copy enclosed)'.

So English Common Law could be based upon a variety of Muslim Sharia law.

Or you could prefer to stick to plunging your head into boiling ploughshares (viz. '1066 And All That') or trial by combat (last done with Ashford v Thornton in 1818.)

It's a mixture of both,just like the language has North European and Latin roots. It's why modern english has nearly 200,000 more words than modern french. That and the infamous "Academie Francaise" which has been resisting expansion of the language since 1635.

Interesting that meat on the hoof (sheep,cow,swine,etc) are Anglo-Saxon in origin but when served up (mutton,beef,pork,etc) are Latin in origin,via Norman French! Who was getting all the meat? :)

Trial by combat was Norman,trial by peers (jury) is Anglo Saxon.

English Common Law has little religious influence other than Christian,though it is quite distinct from Canon Law.

Cheers

Steve
 
I came across this passage translated from Italian.

"The greatest weapon anyone can use against us is our own mind. By preying on the doubts and uncertainties that already lurk there. Are we true to ourselves, or do we live for the expectations of others? And if we are open and honest…can we ever truly be loved? Can we find the courage to release our deepest secrets…or in the end, are we all unknowable? Even to ourselves."

Food for thought.
Cheers
John
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back