The Greatest Fighter Jet of All Time.

Which is the Best?


  • Total voters
    281

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

The F-15E 'Strike Eagle' and is the attack version of the 'Eagle'. For the pure air superiority F-15 it will be the C-model, especially with the AESA radar they are soon to be getting.
 
F-16 Fighting Falcon, great manevourability, payload and range for its size. All round good package that could take out Iranian Nuclear Power Plants and could take out North Korean Nuclear Power Plants as well if given the chance...
 
The F-15E 'Strike Eagle' and is the attack version of the 'Eagle'. For the pure air superiority F-15 it will be the C-model, especially with the AESA radar they are soon to be getting.

Soon. Got 'em. Not all C models, but some. Others are scrambling for AESA for not only commo, long range detection, but also cruise missile detection and non-kinetic weapon capability.
 
No. The ability to focus significant amounts of energy through a small aperature window allows for potential disruption of non-hardened electronics. AESA provides this potential and the DoD is looking into ability to disrupt aircraft/UAS/ground system electronics. This is similar to what you might have read about non-kinetic weapons such as microwave emitters.

Can you imagine the STOVL version of the F-35 coupling the forward fan transmission to a non-kinetic weapon to allow for cruise missile defense, destruction of UAS flight controls/command signals or as a stealthy "wild weasel"?
 
Okay, ah yes, it has that thing akin to a giant search-light on top. Something about using heatray to warm the surface of skin without actually cooking it in the way that a microwave oven does. There was an article in the Sunday Mail discussing it being trialled in Iraq for future deployment...
 
Okay, ah yes, it has that thing akin to a giant search-light on top. Something about using heatray to warm the surface of skin without actually cooking it in the way that a microwave oven does. There was an article in the Sunday Mail discussing it being trialled in Iraq for future deployment...

That would be a different animal. :lol:
 
Yes, sorry, they have them. But I have read more F-15Cs are in the line for the AESA improvement.
 
I know that they are depicted in a lot of the futuristic ideas of warfare. Lasers are seen as a natural progression. Better yet those phaser type guns and rifles out of Star Trek (right the way through) that can be set from Low to Kill settings...
 
Okay, but no, I think the F-35 will be great. Just might need work on its range. We don't have the advantages the Americans do of being able to have a large number of airforce bases as well as civilian airports dotted around the place...
 
A few points about the Sea Harrier in the Falklands.

The Shar never shot down an Etendard. The Argentines didn't lose one in combat.

The Shars flew at low altitude when faced with Mirages. The speed difference was far less.

The Shar had the Lima Sidewinder whereas the Mirages had the less capable Magic. The lima had an excellent kill ratio in combat.

The USMC bought the Harrier because it could do things that no other aircraft could. Not because it was the fastest or the best.

The Gnat would have been an excellent fighter. Shame it carried no fuel or weapons. Other than that it was first class!

The EE Lightning was simply stunning performance.

Loved watching the Su-27 at airshows...amazing stuff.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back