The Pilot Factor

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

PS I have killed 3 grouse, 4 pheasant 1 blackbird and a sparrow just driving my car so I would have been a shoe in as an ace. No credits here for pheasant they are the most suicidal of all living things, its amazing that people pay to shoot them.

Or as a Kamikazi...
 
Or as a Kamikazi...

Honestly Biff there is a road here (between Helmsley and Stokesley) that always has at least 4 pheasants squashed on the road, you will always have 2 or 3 flying out at you it is as if they dont want to live. Pheasants I believe came from China maybe they just want to move onto the next life quickly. If I join a shooting party with a big picture of an Audi front grill I am sure I could become a shooting "ace"
 
Pbehn,

I lived in Oklahoma for a year (USAF Pilot Training). The road kill standard there was a skunk. I called them Oklahoma Road Warriors, since they seemed to die en masse. You would get really good at rolling up windows and turning on the recirculation in your car in a feeble attempt to keep out the stink! I drove an RX-7 then and was afraid if I hit one it would get stuck in the grill...

Cheers,
Biff
 

Nuuuman,

Do you have any data about accelerated stalls, or stalls under G and full or high power settings? I don't know that power off landing type stalls are the same as those found under high power and hard pulls on the stick.

Cheers,
Biff
 

Pbehn,

If you were to be in a nearby plane watching a dogfight (BFM in todays parlance) you would think it was fairly benign. If you were in the aircraft it would be anything but. I took up a 1 star (Brig Gen with a T38, U2, SR71, KC135 background) and did short range defensive set up's with an F-16. When we were on the RTB he told me he had no idea it was so violent. I thought of it as normal due to acclimatization. He also asked why I put my hand up against the canopy, to which I replied to hold myself in the seat (the jet would get to zero or slight negative G during some maneuvers). It's hard to maneuver the plane when you are hanging in the straps.

Not only do you rough house the plane, but the throttles as well. As a defender you try to give the offender problems he can't solve by maneuver closure, which means both the stick and throttle/s are getting moved. What I don't know is how much throttle manipulation they did in pistons (Greg P?). I don't know if those engines could take slamming the throttle from stop to stop without something getting hurt.

Cheers,
Biff
 
It's not so bad when you are matched, say, 8 to 8 ... but 4 on 20 will mean the 4 are going to have a bad time, usually.

Unless you are Saburo Sakai

Imagine what he would have done with 2 eyes working ....... I think he was flying a KI-84 in June 44 when he met the 15 Hellcats?

To show the importance of pilots, I'd take Sakai in a Zero over a competent pilot in a Hellcat.
 
On the topic of fatigue in a fight, I think all of the reasons mentioned are contributors, but the single biggest reason has to be the fact that the pilot had to muscle these aircraft around.

You can read about the stick forces of some of these aircraft - even at lower force levels a man can only last so long.

A couple of good anecdotes here from Wing Commander Hugh Godefroy DSO, DFC and Bar, Croix de Guerre with Gold Star (Fr) -- (though he was a Pilot Officer in the first quote and Flight Lieutenant in the second).


 
Last edited:
Mid-1942 is a little early to be "revisionist," and that's when Leigh-Mallory started his campaign for the .5" and was told he couldn't have it for the reason stated. If you read paragraph II of this paper, it'll give some (early) confirmation of Air Ministry thinking.


If you actually bother to read what I said, I wrote "average pilot," and how many of those never scored a single victory?
With regard to the football-passing analogy, have you seen how many passes don't reach their intended recipient?
Also, I don't think there are many footballers who propel a ball at 1000 feet per second, to a colleague travelling at 250/350 mph.
 
Last edited:
I met Saburo Sakai at a Doug Champlin get-togeter in the early 1980's. He said he was flying a Zero and the Hellcats were following procedure to the letter. He waited for them, to get into firing position and snap-rolled to the left every time just as they shot (he saw the guns fire) ... and nobody ever led him correctly ... they followed training. He escaped and had tremendous respect since if he had not applied airshow aerobatics, he would have been dead.

HIS words, not mine.

All in all a pretty good guy who was very nice to meet. He took a ride in Bill Hane's P-51 after the talk and loved it.

It's in one his books.
 

I dont doubt that at all, I sometimes go to a Kart track, every one who goes for the first time is completely underwhelmed when they see people going around, it looks like pensioners out for a sunday drive. Then they try it themselves and after 10 minutes they are completely knackered, this in a 4bhp kart with a max of about 30mph, the corners are very tight though.
The thing is there are no real straights so unless you learn to relax your hands left and right you get cramp from lack of blood flow.
 

Leigh Mallory doesnt mention shooting grouse, which was the point of my post.
"You could also say that it was people who enjoyed killing animals for sport became good fighter pilots. I honestly believe this is revisionist, the RAF training was poor, so there was a post war consensus that only "grouse shooters" could become pilot aces."


With regard to the football analogy have you seen footballers (soccer) or a quarterback (US Football) warming up or training, they hardly ever miss. During the game there is opposition to tackle intercept or block, apart from in football the player wants to receive and in air combat the target doesnt want to be hit the analogy works perfectly. Some people work better under pressure than others.
 
Last edited:
I think the standard of air-to-air gunnery training in the RAF was poor. The key question is why? Area Fighting Tactics didn't help, with the carefully choreographed, and entirely impractical, manoeuvres by large formations of fighters, with the leader teeing up the squadron and everyone else just following along. It must also be considered that Fighter Command was established to defend the British Isles from bomber attack. The concept of enemy fighters operating in British airspace was discounted until France's surrender made it an operational and tactical reality. It was within this context that the Air Ministry pushed as many pilots through training to grow the front-line strength of Fighter Command, and decisions were made to cut corners in line with the prevailing thought about the nature of the threat and the proposed tactics. If you're not expecting to face fighters, why waste time training on air combat manoeuvring and deflection shooting? Was it right? Clearly not but, equally, in what was perceived as a life-and-death struggle against Nazi Germany, preceded by a race against time to increase Britain's military capabilities, I think it would be harsh to judge the decisions too critically. Decisions are always easy to make in hindsight.
 
@ nuuumannn if the 109s stall characteristics are like that...it stalls more gently than on old cessna 150 ( no capped wing tips )...those will scare the hell the first time as they dip violently to the side ( port iirc ) and want to spin.

@ Biff no armadillo road kills? where i was in oklahoma i rarely saw a skunk kill....more 'dillos and turtles ( believe it or not ).

@ pbehn i wish the LW and VVS records were as plentyful and avaialble as raf and usaaf. in those the degree of defelection commonly mentioned. i will venture to say...but have absolutley no way to prove...the LW was in the same boat as us and raf. some of its pilots did well with delfection shooting and some didnt. i cant remember hartmann ever saying he did...he choose to climb up his enemy's butt before firing. from all i have read about the vvs and their training ( lack thereof or poor ) they were behind the 8 ball with this. probably fewer of their pilots did it well. what they lacked in precision they made up for satuarting the sky with planes and lead. that is entirely my opinion.

@ greyman you just found two sterling examples of what i was saying about fatigue. had either of those pilots got into a fight with a rested or fresh enemy pilot they may not have been able to muster the strength needed to evade and escape. i have read too many accounts where the pilot noted about his prey .." they made no evasive maneuvers" ( to which i attibute fatigue or being wounded )
 
@ Biff no armadillo road kills? where i was in oklahoma i rarely saw a skunk kill....more 'dillos and turtles ( believe it or not ).
An Armadillo can tear up the front end of a car (steering linkage, oil pan, etc.) where a Skunk will just leave a stench for a while.

Of course, both of those options have to be far better than hitting a moose...

 
happened to me last night.

travelling home in thick fog, when suddenly the car infront swerves to the left and in front of me i had an Ambulance on the travelling on the wrong side of a duel carridgeway, i missed a head on by inches !

it looked like he turned right out of a junction but instead of crossing the first two east bound lanes and turn onto the west bound lane he just turned into us, we all swerved and he just carried on travelling in the wrong side of the road !

was still shaking at home 20 minutes later !
 
Remind me not to travel by Ambulance !
And as for hitting things on the road - in my town, do not hit a Hippocroccofrog ! Hitting one causes a Range Rover to end up looking like a Smart car !
 
Rule of the road in Germany, if you hit a wild boar NEVER get out to see how it is, if it isnt dead you very soon may be.
 
Holy crap, Karl!!

That was certainly a close one!

I can also say, from experience, that head-on collisions suck.

And they're hard on the paint job.
 
With regard to the football analogy have you seen footballers (soccer) or a quarterback (US Football) warming up or training, they hardly ever miss.
When the aircraft and targets were standing still, the pilots didn't miss the butts, either.
During the game there is opposition to tackle intercept or block, apart from in football the player wants to receive and in air combat the target doesnt want to be hit the analogy works perfectly.
Except for the speeds involved, of course.
 

Users who are viewing this thread