The Slowest Plane of WW2?

Discussion in 'Aviation' started by Pisis, Apr 21, 2006.

  1. Pisis

    Pisis Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,902
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Praga Mater Urbium

    Attached Files:

  2. plan_D

    plan_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    11,985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    They'd have been slower planes than the Catalina, if we're talking maximum speed. But generally all planes go around the same speed at 0 MPH when they're sat on the ground not doing anything.
     
  3. lesofprimus

    lesofprimus Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    19,162
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Communications
    Location:
    Long Island Native in Mississippi
    Home Page:
    I would think the Storch was slower than the PBY.....
     
  4. Pisis

    Pisis Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,902
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Praga Mater Urbium
    Maybe, but planes like Storch, Piper "Primus" Cub, etc. were currier planes anyway. I mean combat planes...
     
  5. plan_D

    plan_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    11,985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Well, you said 'slowest plane' , indicating any plane of World War II. You actually mean planes that carried weapons and were used in active, engaging the enemy, combat ?
     
  6. KraziKanuK

    KraziKanuK Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The question was: But what was the slowest fighter and the slowest bobmer in World War II?

    I see no 'edit' for the post.
     
  7. plan_D

    plan_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    11,985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    The title was "The Slowest Plane of WW2?" which is a question in itself. And then he went on to state that the PBY was the slowest, which was an answer to his own question that we're disputing.
     
  8. Pisis

    Pisis Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,902
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Praga Mater Urbium
    Oh my god, planD... :rolleyes:
    Can't you read?
    "...But what was the slowest fighter and the slowest bomber in World War II?"
    BTW, PBY was also a combat plane, sinking 37 U-boats during the WWII...
     
  9. plan_D

    plan_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    11,985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    When you title something with a question, it's a question. Or don't either of you understand simple English? And question mark indicates a question, funnily enough. You made a question in the title and answered it with the PBY, and both Dan and I disputed the title question/answer. Or are both of you too stupid to understand simple conversation?

    And where did I dispute that the PBY was not a combat aircraft? What land or planet do you live in because it's becoming increasingly more difficult to believe that you live in the same one as the rest of us. Stop smoking that shit Pisis, and step back to reality.
     
  10. Wurger

    Wurger Siggy Master
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2005
    Messages:
    42,737
    Likes Received:
    977
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A retired military Navigator/ATC, FIS controller
    Location:
    Poland
    I think that PZL P-7a could be as the slowest fighter.
    Its max. speed at 0m altitude - 276 km/h, at 4000m - 327km/h, at 6000m - 309 km/h.The cruise speed - 285 km/h
    The slowest bomber name could go to PZL P-23A/B Karas.Its max. speed at 0m - 263/274 km/h, at 3000m - 304/319 km/h.The cruise speed - 230/270 km/h.
    But I could be wrong.
     
  11. Jabberwocky

    Jabberwocky Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,089
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Japan
    My vote for the slowest bomber would be the Po-2/U-2

    Originally built as a transport/utility, it was used by the Russians in vast numbers as a light night harrasment bomber, it was usually fitted with a pair of 120kg bombs or (occasionally) 4 RS-82 rockets.

    Flown by the famous 'night witches', female combat pilots in VVS service, the Russians had a serise of nicknames for it, including 'lawnmover', 'grasscutter' and 'sewing machine'.

    The Po-2 was powered by a 5 cylinder radial that produced barely more than 100 hp. Night bombing runs would often be made with the engine switched off, gliding in towards the target area, and then releasing the bombs onto the unsuspecting enemy position.

    And the maximum speed? Just 155 kph/98mph!

    Reportedly, when a Po-2 was spotted they were quite difficult to shoot down. The planes were so slow and nimble that they drove German pilots in the faster and far more powerful 190s and 109s into fits just trying to engage a target doing less than 1/3 their velocity.
     
  12. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    22,714
    Likes Received:
    605
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Flight Instructor/ Aircraft Inspector
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    The Storch, hands down!!!!
     
  13. evangilder

    evangilder "Shooter"
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    19,419
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Network Engineer/Photographer
    Location:
    Moorpark, CA
    Home Page:
    Agreed, Joe. And the Storch wasn't just a courier airplane.
     
  14. KraziKanuK

    KraziKanuK Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The one that has an English comprehesion problem is you pD for Pisis went on in the text of his post and further qualified what his was asking for in his thread title.

    Yes the Po-2 was slow but so was the 'Stringbags'. ;)
     
  15. Twitch

    Twitch Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    809
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    historical combat aviation writer
    Location:
    City of the Angels California
    Pisis is saying FIGHTER and BOMBER and the PO-2 and Storch were neither.
     
  16. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    22,714
    Likes Received:
    605
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Flight Instructor/ Aircraft Inspector
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    Ah ok I MISSED THAT...
     
  17. syscom3

    syscom3 Pacific Historian

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,577
    Likes Received:
    276
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    The TBD Devestator carrying its torpedo was very slow. Probably couldnt even make more than 120 knots.

    Once it dropped its load, it could speed up just a little.
     
  18. hartmann

    hartmann Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Spain
    May can be the "Swordfish" with torpedo?.
    I´m only guesing.
     
  19. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    this topic's been discussed before......
     
  20. syscom3

    syscom3 Pacific Historian

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,577
    Likes Received:
    276
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    We can discuss this again.
     
Loading...

Share This Page