When we talk about fighters in WW2, the first one jump out from our brain would be P-51 Mustang, the most fierce, powerful, violent fighter for combat in air in that era we will say so.
Yes, the bubble canopy, the rectangular shaped wing makes it seemingly more handsome, neat, proportional or pulchritude even we shall say.
Nevertheless, we are not judging lady or playboy here, we ought to support self opinion by data study.
Then here is mine:
If we change it via sort in terms of unit power, we will see the P-51 down to the 15th far out of top ten.
If we exchange then in terms of Wing Load, the P-51 still sit on fifth seat
So what made Mustang so impressive? Merely nice-looking or really outstanding on specification?
Yes, the bubble canopy, the rectangular shaped wing makes it seemingly more handsome, neat, proportional or pulchritude even we shall say.
Nevertheless, we are not judging lady or playboy here, we ought to support self opinion by data study.
Then here is mine:
If we change it via sort in terms of unit power, we will see the P-51 down to the 15th far out of top ten.
If we exchange then in terms of Wing Load, the P-51 still sit on fifth seat
So what made Mustang so impressive? Merely nice-looking or really outstanding on specification?