What plane do you wish had sawservice

UMMM.... Yes.
 
I think they used them because they took them from the Italians and would use anythign that was decent, but not because they thought the Me-109G and Fw-190's could not.
 
Maybe. Whatever the case though, when the Series 5 fighters were entering service in 1943 they were right up with the best of the time.
 
First massive error that I care to point out, the Cr.42. It wasn't good, in fact it was pretty crap. As all bi-planes were.
 
In relative terms it was good though.

Wow lanc, shows that youve done lots of research on your Italian planes, because if you could be arsed to do a little look around youd see that they werent all "rubbish" compared to Allied designs.
 
Comparitively, my turds could be considered good...compared to let's say a B-25 Roc. That doesn't make the Cr.42 good.
 
It's good compared to a Wright Flyer
 
Wright Flyer with a couple of .50 cals won the wings would make for a great ground attack aircraft, as it operates best at an altitude of around 3 - 4 feet :lol:
 
Going around 5 mph, it'd probably just crash and fall to the ground. Whoever it crashed into would brush off his shoulder and laugh at the pilot.
 
Im sorry but I can not think of too many good Italian designs. I think they just failed in the aircraft department.
 
They may have been some of the best that the Italians made but compared to Me-109's and Spitfires they would put a fight at best. Against a Fw-190 or P-38 they stood know chance.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back