Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
That's a good question and unfortunately, I am far from being a source of information on the Japanese military's proceedure regarding pilot rotation.I wonder if some of that time might have been recovering from wounds received in battle or aircraft mishaps? Not disputing what you said in any way, but maybe after recovering, they were sent to an OTU in order to get their feet wet again?
Actually some got less (not defending their actions). Hartmann was among the last to be released because he refused to cooperate and sign any confessions. He was put on trial twice (the second time represented himself) and was convicted both times.
Can you name a few of these "Experten" that you consider insane?
They didn't have that luxury, especially the last 6 months of the war.
According to Williamson Murray's Luftwaffe: Strategy for Defeat 1933–1945, the flying hours in training programs for the RAF, USAAF, and Luftwaffe for stated time periods:
View attachment 664167
You can read the text of Murray's book online at Hyperwar.
But remember those airfields had good aaa support. Light and heavy. It was certainly not a turkey shoot but good planning to make it look like one. I believe i have read that attacking an airfield was quite dangerous. More then 1 allied air ace was shot down attacking those.Although it could be argued that much Luftwaffe training was actually combat flying.
Unlike an RAF or USAAF pilot under training who had no worries about being attacked, being shot down was a constant fear for Luftwaffe trainees.
Their flying schools were 'fair game' to marauding Thunderbolts and Mustangs - there is even some combat footage out there of the resultant turkey shoots when a flying school got jumped with all its trainers up. The Poles seemed to take a great pleasure in these fighter raids when they traded in their Spitfires for Mustangs.
But remember those airfields had good aaa support. Light and heavy. It was certainly not a turkey shoot but good planning to make it look like one. I believe i have read that attacking an airfield was quite dangerous. More then 1 allied air ace was shot down attacking those.
There were many many airfields. Go look up deZeng et all. The schools were protected. Would be unwise not to do so.Yes, the Fighter airfields were well defended, but their civil and training airfields weren't.
And once the Mustangs came to town, no where west of Berlin was safe, even for civil fields with a handful of Steiglitz trainers.
Its a harsh fact, most of Germanys 'experten' were schooled in the training ground of the Spanish Civil War and the cake walk against utterly obsolescent types across most of Europe in 1939-40. - Once they met a professional Air Force with modern aircraft at the English Channel, it was tears before bedtime.
Only 8 of Germanys aces with more than 100 kills joined a Squadron after mid 1942.
There were many many airfields. Go look up deZeng et all. The schools were protected. Would be unwise not to do so.
Your harsh facts can do with a bit of reading up on the subject.
Sorry, you're wrong and make many generalizations here - the Luftwaffe, as shown had a pretty robust training program at the start of the war. The expansion of the war overburdened all of Germany's resources (including pilot training). Targeting of oil resources and as well as the allied bombing offensive (once it was able to successfully operate with sustainable losses) eventually took it's tollThey never even gave themselves the luxury at the start of the war.
Again - an opinion and generalization. No doubt Goering has his delusional take on what the Luftwaffe fighter forces should be accomplishing but to say that there was a cult of Luftwaffe pilots just caring about their scores is an opinion and generalization.The Luftwaffe was a WWI Airforce - in monoplanes - it never grasped the need to build a depth of skill, the cult of the 'Jeager' was written into it thanks to the likes of Goering.
The fighter was everything, the cult of the ace and the hunter was their creed - high scores were the thing, not teaching.
The Germans never really got past the WWI principle of 'learn on the job' at the Squadron.
And during the war the Luftwaffe did the same but could not maintain that training continuity because they (along will all of Germany's forces) were overburdenedPar example… the Battle of Britain.
The Germans lost hundreds of combat experienced pilots who flew relentlessly until they got shot down, and even more replacement pilots trying to learn on the job.
At the height of the Battle of Britain, the RAF had over 1,200 pilots with 100+ hours combat flying under their belts driving desks and in OCU's passing on lessons.
Rotating out never stopped for an RAF pilot, you hit the hours in your log, pack your bags and off to the rear.
The RAF was in a similar position as the Luftwaffe was in at the end of the war. Tactics, radar, the tenacity of those who did fight during the BoB, Hitler's stupidity and a little bit of luck untimely won the BoBIts a common myth the RAF were throwing 'green' and 'barely trained' pilots into the fight because they were 'desperate'… nope, they were indeed green, but they'd all been to an OCU, and they were fed into the fight because they were next ones up. The 'how many hours have you got on a Spitfire', 'Six Sir' is often quoted as 'proof' the pilots were untrained, but its a misleading question, 'Six Sir' because most of his OCU hours were on a Hurricane - unsurprisingly, the RAFs premier fighter was a bit thin on the ground in OCU's.
Again your opinion with no facts - and no one (not even the RAF) was ready for "the long war" in September 1939 -From Sept 3 1939, the Luftwaffe was a constantly degrading force.
They were living for the next dogfight, the RAF was building for the 'long war'.
So tell us, who were they???Only 8 of Germanys aces with more than 100 kills joined a Squadron after mid 1942.
Interesting understatement. Probably 80+% of aces shot down were from flak. Dad's 355th FG lost zero aces to German fighters, but lost Olson, Koraleski, Brown (Lenfest stuck in mud trying to rescue Brown)But remember those airfields had good aaa support. Light and heavy. It was certainly not a turkey shoot but good planning to make it look like one. I believe i have read that attacking an airfield was quite dangerous. More then 1 allied air ace was shot down attacking those.
The Luftwaffe had one if the most intensive pilot training programs of any air force in the world by the start of the European war.
It is true that the Luftwaffe had to make adjustments after 1942, as the fortunes of war turned against them and continued to degrade as the war drug on, but to assume that the Luftwaffe was putting trainee pilots into the fight during the Battle of Britain is amusing.
Quite obviously not true. The LW gained in strength through to the invasion of Norway not only in numbers but in types like the Bf 109E. and Ju88. The RAF was playing catch up.From Sept 3 1939, the Luftwaffe was a constantly degrading force.
They were living for the next dogfight, the RAF was building for the 'long war'.
Noy sure where you're going with this, but during the Battle of Britain, the Luftwaffe gained 204 aces alone - this was 1940.If you use a wide definition of 1942… only the following 100+ aces joined operational Squadrons in and from 1942
With the exception of Ettal, all scored all or bar a few kills on the Eastern Front.
So… these new 'experten' weren't very expert against the well trained RAF and USAAF pilots who had no problem curbing the Luftwaffe
Hauptmann Erich Hartmann ~ 352
Oberleutnant Gerhard Thyben ~ 157
Hauptmann Franz Schall ~ 137
Oberleutnant Otto Fonnekold ~ 136
Oberleutnant Hans Waldmann ~ 134
Oberleutnant Wolf Ettal ~ 124
Oberleutnant Freiderich Oblese ~ 120
Leutnant Heinz Wernicke ~ 117
Leutnant Berthold Korts ~ 113
Oberleutnant Bernhard Vechtel ~ 108
Leutnant Heinz Sachsenberg ~ 104
Ulrich Wernitz ~ 101
And as for Hartmann?
352 kills, but he took 1,425 missions to achieve that.
Richard Bong scored 40 kills in 146 missions.
Average tour of duty USAAF pilot? 1 year, 100-150 missions.
Also, a very high proportion of Hartmanns kills were over very poor aircraft like the LaGG-3 and P-39, only a handful of his kills were combat-worthy adversaries..
Unlike the Luftwaffe over the Eastern Front, RAF and USAAF pilots didn't have the luxury of large numbers of elderly and obsolete aircraft to shoot down in one sided combats. They were fighting the Luftwaffe best types.
Hartmann kills per mission: .247And as for Hartmann?
352 kills, but he took 1,425 missions to achieve that.
Richard Bong scored 40 kills in 146 missions.
Actually Hartmann didn't fly his first combat mission until October 1942If you use a wide definition of 1942… only the following 100+ aces joined operational Squadrons in and from 1942
With the exception of Ettal, all scored all or bar a few kills on the Eastern Front.
The Luftwaffe wasn't "curbed" (at least in the west) until it was attacked on the ground.So… these new 'experten' weren't very expert against the well trained RAF and USAAF pilots who had no problem curbing the Luftwaffe
Hauptmann Erich Hartmann ~ 352
Oberleutnant Gerhard Thyben ~ 157
Hauptmann Franz Schall ~ 137
Oberleutnant Otto Fonnekold ~ 136
Oberleutnant Hans Waldmann ~ 134
Oberleutnant Wolf Ettal ~ 124
Oberleutnant Freiderich Oblese ~ 120
Leutnant Heinz Wernicke ~ 117
Leutnant Berthold Korts ~ 113
Oberleutnant Bernhard Vechtel ~ 108
Leutnant Heinz Sachsenberg ~ 104
Ulrich Wernitz ~ 101
352 "claims." Hartmann like Bong did have breaks in their tour. This is meaningless unless you can compare a snapshot of time when they both saw action. You also have to consider the mission they were flying and the numbers they were facing.And as for Hartmann?
352 kills, but he took 1,425 missions to achieve that.
Richard Bong scored 40 kills in 146 missions.
It varied throughout the war. There were some sent home after flying 25 missions, others came back for a second tour.Average tour of duty USAAF pilot? 1 year, 100-150 missions.
Now this is bogus - At the beginning of this thread you can see a list of 72 of his claims, the P-39 in the capacity it was operated by the Soviets was very formidable against the Luftwaffe and I believe most of the Soviet Union's aces flew the P-39. Hartmann WAS NOT flying against obsolete aircraft when he got into combat in late 1942 and the competition only got more difficult the longer he was in combat.Also, a very high proportion of Hartmanns kills were over very poor aircraft like the LaGG-3 and P-39, only a handful of his kills were combat-worthy adversaries..
Unlike the Luftwaffe over the Eastern Front, RAF and USAAF pilots didn't have the luxury of large numbers of elderly and obsolete aircraft to shoot down in one sided combats. They were fighting the Luftwaffe best types.
??? Early war in SWP/CBI - maybe 75-100 missions.Average tour of duty USAAF pilot? 1 year, 100-150 missions.
I know. Trying to get M Macandy to the books. One can be an ace but lighting up an airfield defended with aaa is perhaps far more dangerous as you most certainly know. I think it is a different skill all together. That AAA shot at everything coming close. Even own airplanes.Interesting understatement. Probably 80+% of aces shot down were from flak. Dad's 355th FG lost zero aces to German fighters, but lost Olson, Koraleski, Brown (Lenfest stuck in mud trying to rescue Brown)
Read more.A couple of MG's isn't going to stop a Squadron of P-51's massacring the training aircraft they jump in the skies surrounding the field doing circuits unless the fighters for some perverse reason ignore the panicking trainers and insist on flying up and down the small grass strip.
And many 2nd and 3rd line elementary airfields were just that - a grass strip, a hut and some trainer and civil instructors - Maybe a home guard dude with an old MG-08, not some huge Luftwaffe fortified air base with multiple layers of flak. The elementary fields were very soft targets and considered very fair game.
ETA: Just looked up your source… sure enough,
Arbeitsplatz (training fields) grass fields, no infrastructure, no defences