parsifal
Colonel
Churchill could at times be ruthless. But he was not murderous. theres a difference. He is also criticized for his lack of realism and meddling in affairs military, yet he also provided a great injection of lateral thinking to Allied military planning. He was a master of diplomacy, and in WWII in no small measure was responsible for grooming the US from a sleeping, uncaring giant, to a fire breathing tiger for the allied cause. There have been similar conspiracy theories about his foreknowledge of the Pearl Harbour attack....all poppycock.
I expect close examination of the Lusitania sinking will yield the same null results for the revisionists working quietly in the background to discredit him.
Churchill was far from perfect, but he was as near to perfect as a wartime leader for britain, as one could hope for.
I expect close examination of the Lusitania sinking will yield the same null results for the revisionists working quietly in the background to discredit him.
Churchill was far from perfect, but he was as near to perfect as a wartime leader for britain, as one could hope for.