This case is very different, and difficult to explain.
There were not match fixing, nor monetary exchanges, nor crimes at all. Ordinary justice, the only that can jail someone, is completely out of that case, that's related only with violations of the "regolamento sportivo" that, even sanctioned by a law, is the internal code of the Football Federation. The judge is not an ordinary court, but an arbiter, and the violations are related more to a "system" in wich managers and referee seems to be too close and capable to influence each other that with specifically individuated violations.
The first two grades of the procedure (that one and the next) are summaries and requires only few days. For the third, and final, grade, Italian law indicates the competence of the TAR, that's an ordinary court (normally it judges about the behaviour of the pubblic administration).
It's hard to say if this procedure, that's based more on a mass of indications (even if well documented) that on real proofs, can survive to the exam of an ordinary court. But that's the problem, infact the FIFA want the sportif justice to be completely indipendent from ordinary one, so it's disposable to accept only the result of the first two grades of the procedure, while italian law, obviously, can't accept that someone can't resort to the justice to defend his rights.